From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Skip console drivers on PREEMPT_RT.
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:56:01 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilnrn06u.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ytgu17hATM8iqdGC@linutronix.de>
On 2022-07-20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
>> > @@ -2843,6 +2843,16 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>> > }
>> >
>> > /*
>> > + * On PREEMPT_RT it is not possible to invoke console drivers with
>> > + * disabled interrupts and or preemption. Therefore all drivers are
>> > + * skipped and the output can be retrieved from the buffer.
>> > + */
>> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
>> > + up_console_sem();
>>
>> This should be:
>>
>> __console_unlock();
>
> Why?
Because that is the official function that performs the console
unlocking. With upcoming patches, that function does more. But even
without those patches, by directly calling up_console_sem() you are
leaving @console_locked set. The @console_locked variable is used by the
vt code to validate correct console locking.
I realize you are just copy/pasting from the condition above (checking
@console_suspended), but that condition is special. When consoles are
suspended, we still allow @console_sem to be locked/unlocked, but
without changing the locked status of the console. See suspend_console()
and resume_console() if you really want to see the gory details.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-20 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-20 15:48 [PATCH] printk: Skip console drivers on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-20 16:26 ` John Ogness
2022-07-20 16:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-20 17:50 ` John Ogness [this message]
2022-07-21 6:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-22 12:39 ` Petr Mladek
2022-07-22 17:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-25 12:30 ` Petr Mladek
2022-07-25 12:51 ` John Ogness
2022-07-25 13:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-25 14:24 ` Petr Mladek
2022-07-25 15:16 ` [PATCH v3] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-07-26 7:39 ` Petr Mladek
2022-07-26 7:57 ` John Ogness
2022-07-26 13:11 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilnrn06u.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox