From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nitesh Lal <nilal@redhat.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alex Belits <abelits@belits.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Oscar Shiang <oscar0225@livemail.tw>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v12 09/13] task isolation: add preempt notifier to sync per-CPU vmstat dirty info to thread info
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:09:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilquybgz.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rrryp8y.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Apr 27 2022 at 09:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15 2022 at 12:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> If a thread has task isolation activated, is preempted by thread B,
>> which marks vmstat information dirty, and is preempted back in,
>> one might return to userspace with vmstat dirty information on the
>> CPU in question.
>>
>> To address this problem, add a preempt notifier that transfers vmstat dirty
>> information to TIF_TASK_ISOL thread flag.
>
> How does this compile with CONFIG_KVM=n?
Aside of that, the existance of this preempt notifier alone tells me
that this is either a design fail or has no design in the first place.
The state of vmstat does not matter at all at the point where a task is
scheduled in. It matters when an isolated task goes out to user space or
enters a VM.
We already have something similar in the exit to user path:
tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare()
So you can do something like the below and have:
static inline void task_isol_exit_to_user_prepare(void)
{
if (unlikely(current_needs_isol_exit_to_user())
__task_isol_exit_to_user_prepare();
}
where current_needs_isol_exit_to_user() is a simple check of either an
existing mechanism like
task->syscall_work & SYSCALL_WORK_TASK_ISOL_EXIT
or of some new task isolation specific member of task_struct which is
placed so it is cache hot at that point:
task->isol_work & SYSCALL_TASK_ISOL_EXIT
which is going to be almost zero overhead for any non isolated task.
It's trivial enough to encode the real stuff into task->isol_work and
I'm pretty sure, that a 32bit member is sufficient for that. There is
absolutely no need for a potential 64x64 bit feature matrix.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@ void noinstr exit_to_user_mode(void)
/* Workaround to allow gradual conversion of architecture code */
void __weak arch_do_signal_or_restart(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
+static void exit_to_user_update_work(void)
+{
+ tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
+ task_isol_exit_to_user_prepare();
+}
+
static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long ti_work)
{
@@ -178,8 +184,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_l
*/
local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
- /* Check if any of the above work has queued a deferred wakeup */
- tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
+ exit_to_user_update_work();
ti_work = read_thread_flags();
}
@@ -194,8 +199,7 @@ static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(st
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
- /* Flush pending rcuog wakeup before the last need_resched() check */
- tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
+ exit_to_user_update_work();
if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 15:31 [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 01/13] s390: add support for TIF_TASK_ISOL Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 02/13] x86: " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 03/13] add basic task isolation prctl interface Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 22:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 04/13] add prctl task isolation prctl docs and samples Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-26 0:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 05/13] task isolation: sync vmstats on return to userspace Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 23:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 6:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 06/13] procfs: add per-pid task isolation state Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 23:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 07/13] task isolation: sync vmstats conditional on changes Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-17 14:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-04-27 8:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 08/13] task isolation: enable return to userspace processing Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 09/13] task isolation: add preempt notifier to sync per-CPU vmstat dirty info to thread info Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-16 2:41 ` Oscar Shiang
2022-04-27 7:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 12:09 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-05-04 16:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 17:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 10/13] KVM: x86: process isolation work from VM-entry code path Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 11/13] mm: vmstat: move need_update Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 12/13] mm: vmstat_refresh: avoid queueing work item if cpu stats are clean Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27 7:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 19:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 13/13] task isolation: only TIF_TASK_ISOL if task isolation is enabled Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27 7:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 19:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-17 15:08 ` [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Frederic Weisbecker
2022-04-25 16:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 18:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27 9:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-05-03 18:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-04 18:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-05 16:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-06-01 16:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 17:01 ` Tim Chen
2022-05-04 20:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilquybgz.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=abelits@belits.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=oscar0225@livemail.tw \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox