public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nitesh Lal <nilal@redhat.com>,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alex Belits <abelits@belits.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Oscar Shiang <oscar0225@livemail.tw>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v12 09/13] task isolation: add preempt notifier to sync per-CPU vmstat dirty info to thread info
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:09:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilquybgz.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rrryp8y.ffs@tglx>

On Wed, Apr 27 2022 at 09:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15 2022 at 12:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> If a thread has task isolation activated, is preempted by thread B,
>> which marks vmstat information dirty, and is preempted back in,
>> one might return to userspace with vmstat dirty information on the 
>> CPU in question.
>>
>> To address this problem, add a preempt notifier that transfers vmstat dirty
>> information to TIF_TASK_ISOL thread flag.
>
> How does this compile with CONFIG_KVM=n?

Aside of that, the existance of this preempt notifier alone tells me
that this is either a design fail or has no design in the first place.

The state of vmstat does not matter at all at the point where a task is
scheduled in. It matters when an isolated task goes out to user space or
enters a VM.

We already have something similar in the exit to user path:

   tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare()

So you can do something like the below and have:

static inline void task_isol_exit_to_user_prepare(void)
{
        if (unlikely(current_needs_isol_exit_to_user())
        	__task_isol_exit_to_user_prepare();
}

where current_needs_isol_exit_to_user() is a simple check of either an
existing mechanism like

         task->syscall_work & SYSCALL_WORK_TASK_ISOL_EXIT

or of some new task isolation specific member of task_struct which is
placed so it is cache hot at that point:

        task->isol_work & SYSCALL_TASK_ISOL_EXIT

which is going to be almost zero overhead for any non isolated task.

It's trivial enough to encode the real stuff into task->isol_work and
I'm pretty sure, that a 32bit member is sufficient for that. There is
absolutely no need for a potential 64x64 bit feature matrix.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -142,6 +142,12 @@ void noinstr exit_to_user_mode(void)
 /* Workaround to allow gradual conversion of architecture code */
 void __weak arch_do_signal_or_restart(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
 
+static void exit_to_user_update_work(void)
+{
+	tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
+	task_isol_exit_to_user_prepare();
+}
+
 static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
 					    unsigned long ti_work)
 {
@@ -178,8 +184,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_l
 		 */
 		local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
 
-		/* Check if any of the above work has queued a deferred wakeup */
-		tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
+		exit_to_user_update_work();
 
 		ti_work = read_thread_flags();
 	}
@@ -194,8 +199,7 @@ static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(st
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
 
-	/* Flush pending rcuog wakeup before the last need_resched() check */
-	tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
+	exit_to_user_update_work();
 
 	if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
 		ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-15 15:31 [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 01/13] s390: add support for TIF_TASK_ISOL Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 02/13] x86: " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 03/13] add basic task isolation prctl interface Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 22:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 04/13] add prctl task isolation prctl docs and samples Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-26  0:15   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 05/13] task isolation: sync vmstats on return to userspace Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 23:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27  6:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 06/13] procfs: add per-pid task isolation state Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 23:27   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 07/13] task isolation: sync vmstats conditional on changes Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-17 14:51   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-04-27  8:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 08/13] task isolation: enable return to userspace processing Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 09/13] task isolation: add preempt notifier to sync per-CPU vmstat dirty info to thread info Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-16  2:41   ` Oscar Shiang
2022-04-27  7:11   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 12:09     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-05-04 16:32       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 17:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 10/13] KVM: x86: process isolation work from VM-entry code path Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 11/13] mm: vmstat: move need_update Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 12/13] mm: vmstat_refresh: avoid queueing work item if cpu stats are clean Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27  7:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 19:17     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 13/13] task isolation: only TIF_TASK_ISOL if task isolation is enabled Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27  7:45   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 19:12     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 13:03       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-17 15:08 ` [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Frederic Weisbecker
2022-04-25 16:29   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 21:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 18:57       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27  9:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-05-03 18:57   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 13:20     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-04 18:56       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 20:15         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-05 16:52           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-06-01 16:14             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 17:01 ` Tim Chen
2022-05-04 20:08   ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ilquybgz.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=abelits@belits.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilal@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
    --cc=oscar0225@livemail.tw \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox