From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712C8C433F5 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343731AbiAROj3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:39:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245596AbiAROj2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:39:28 -0500 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8464FC06161C for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 06:39:28 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1642516766; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8FzwLn6QhkjWOJPvQFfLGKg9NeOr8S3LYPkXtc320u0=; b=St3eBuBZ/F0CROeqTq2RABGHuQ/toJl5+SIMqZJO+VRanPNow9wXTK3UOo1uVkq3Y5hp3n NY2XYVeCmfgwuiO0jz9ybEkvK8COvdTUXm3HVqhHS7ObPdkRplDdhjWaoml5RY10sqH93o mRYcH2RnOKf8znx77EkVptAD+fyZq1Zy+j7nuaDH2DYrmIj90LsUJvIQrki7Bf9uHxWYPD 9KWITF890gYBVxQkG2CIMtRJwbNgEMkRRkslVY52O8dqGSKAjhI8OaN8tB/zRlbCJTCNL1 mwmPe4jlex3gGhQO5zl1Ta2CY/vsRbKPuUUlKoIvVBQ+lKXQjOejdOY0ZJH8kg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1642516766; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8FzwLn6QhkjWOJPvQFfLGKg9NeOr8S3LYPkXtc320u0=; b=p6XR/lahExYGbDJOBET2pFfE9V9sBKuP/U/WjjJeQXPT9nJNKUrOpa2l3euPT4TpOBS/f2 D1bILl4F/XmCfrCA== To: Marc Zyngier , Tong Zhang Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] genirq/msi: fix crash when handling Multi-MSI In-Reply-To: <87h7a28uhj.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20220117092759.1619771-1-ztong0001@gmail.com> <87ilui8yxt.wl-maz@kernel.org> <87h7a28uhj.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:39:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87iluh9kgx.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 17 2022 at 11:36, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:10:13 +0000, > Tong Zhang wrote: >> pci_msi_domain_check_cap (used by ops->msi_check(domain, info, dev)) >> msi_domain_prepare_irqs >> __msi_domain_alloc_irqs >> msi_domain_alloc_irqs_descs_locked >> >> What I am suggesting is commit 0f62d941acf9 changed how this return >> value is being handled and created a UAF > > OK, this makes more sense. > > But msi_domain_prepare_irqs() shouldn't fail in this case, and we > should proceed with the allocation of at least one vector, which isn't > happening here. > > Also, if __msi_domain_alloc_irqs() is supposed to return the number of > irqs allocated, it isn't doing it consistently. > > Thomas, can you shed some light on what is the intended behaviour > here? Let me stare at it.