From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>,
Julian Scheel <julian@jusst.de>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] USB Audio Gadget refactoring
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 12:42:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inkevi87.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1495060654-31126-1-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2822 bytes --]
Hi,
Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com> writes:
> I came to this patch series when wanted to do two things:
> - use UAC1 as virtual ALSA sound card on gadget side,
> just like UAC2 is used so it's possible to do rate
> resampling
> - have both playback/capture support in UAC1
>
> Since I wanted to have same behavior for both UAC1/UAC2,
> obviously I've got an utility part (u_audio.c) for
> virtual ALSA sound card handling like we have
> for ethernet(u_ether) or serial(u_serial) functions.
> Function-specific parts (f_uac1/f_uac2) became almost
> as storage for class-specific USB descriptors, some
> boilerplate for configfs, binding and few USB
> config request handling.
>
> Originally in RFC [1] I've posted before, there was
> major change to f_uac1 after that it couldn't do
> direct play to existing ALSA sound card anymore,
> representing audio on gadget side as virtual
> ALSA sound card where audio streams are simply
> sinked to and sourced from it, so it may break
> current usecase for some people (and that's why
> it was RFC).
>
> During RFC discussion, it was agreed to not touch
> existing f_uac1 implementation and create new one
> instead. This patchset (v4) introduced new function
> named f_uac1_acard and doesn't touch current f_uac1
> implementation, so people still can use old behavior
Do you have a pointer to the original RFC discussion where this was
discussed? If we really *must* keep the old implementation, I would
rather rename that to f_uac1_legacy. Still, I find it unlikely that
anybody will care about the old implementation.
> Now, it's possible to use existing user-space
> applications for audio routing between Audio Gadget
> and real sound card. I personally use alsaloop tool
> from alsautils and have ability to create PCM
> loopback between two different ALSA cards using
> rate resampling, which was not possible with previous
> "direct play to ALSA card" approach in f_uac1.
this is really good result and will actually make it a lot easier for
testing things out.
> While here, also dropped redundant platform
> driver/device creation in f_uac2 driver (as well as
> didn't add "never implemented" volume/mute functionality
> in f_uac1 to f_uac1_acard) that made this work even
> easier to do.
>
> This series is tested with both legacy g_audio.ko and
> modern configfs approaches under Ubuntu 14.04 (UAC1 and
> UAC2) and under Windows7 x64 (UAC1 only) having
> perfect results in all cases.
>
> Comments, testing are welcome.
>
> v4 changes:
> - renamed f_uac1_newapi to f_uac1_acard that is
> more meaningful
I really don't get why you wanna keep both f_uac1 and f_uac1_acard. Why
do we need to maintain the old uac1 implementation? Why two separate
files?
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-02 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-17 22:37 [PATCH v4 0/3] USB Audio Gadget refactoring Ruslan Bilovol
2017-05-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] usb: gadget: f_uac2: remove platform driver/device creation Ruslan Bilovol
2017-05-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] usb: gadget: f_uac2: split out audio core Ruslan Bilovol
2017-05-22 15:58 ` Jassi Brar
2017-05-29 23:43 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2017-06-02 11:47 ` Jassi Brar
2017-06-02 9:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-06-02 21:11 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2017-05-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] usb: gadget: add f_uac1 variant based on a new u_audio api Ruslan Bilovol
2017-05-26 15:52 ` Julian Scheel
2017-05-30 0:07 ` Ruslan Bilovol
2017-06-02 9:42 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2017-06-02 21:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] USB Audio Gadget refactoring Ruslan Bilovol
2017-06-05 9:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-06-06 7:44 ` Greg KH
2017-06-06 9:41 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-06-06 19:43 ` Ruslan Bilovol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87inkevi87.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
--cc=julian@jusst.de \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com \
--cc=zonque@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox