From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>,
jlayton@poochiereds.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
serge.hallyn@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] locks: Show only file_locks created in the same pidns as current process
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:09:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87invjq97h.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802174003.GD11767@fieldses.org> (J. Bruce Fields's message of "Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:40:03 -0400")
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:00:39AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> writes:
>>
>> > Currently when /proc/locks is read it will show all the file locks
>> > which are currently created on the machine. On containers, hosted
>> > on busy servers this means that doing lsof can be very slow. I
>> > observed up to 5 seconds stalls reading 50k locks, while the container
>> > itself had only a small number of relevant entries. Fix it by
>> > filtering the locks listed by the pidns of the current process
>> > and the process which created the lock.
>>
>> The locks always confuse me so I am not 100% connecting locks
>> to a pid namespace is appropriate.
>>
>> That said if you are going to filter by pid namespace please use the pid
>> namespace of proc, not the pid namespace of the process reading the
>> file.
>
> Oh, that makes sense, thanks.
>
> What does /proc/mounts use, out of curiosity? The mount namespace that
> /proc was originally mounted in?
/proc/mounts -> /proc/self/mounts
/proc/[pid]/mounts lists mounts from the mount namespace of the
appropriate process.
That is another way to go but it is a tread carefully thing as changing
things that way it is easy to surprise apparmor or selinux rules and be
surprised you broke someones userspace in a way that prevents booting.
Although I suspect /proc/locks isn't too bad.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 14:42 [RFC PATCH] locks: Show only file_locks created in the same pidns as current process Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-02 14:45 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-02 15:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-02 15:20 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-02 15:43 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-02 16:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-08-02 17:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-02 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2016-08-02 19:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-02 20:01 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-02 20:11 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-02 20:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-03 7:35 ` [PATCH v2] locks: Filter /proc/locks output on proc pid ns Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-03 13:46 ` Jeff Layton
2016-08-03 14:17 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-03 14:28 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-03 14:33 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-03 14:54 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2016-08-03 15:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-03 15:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2016-08-03 15:10 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-08-03 17:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87invjq97h.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=kernel@kyup.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox