From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: fsl_udc_core: Fix pullup status
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:31:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87io05shhq.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458918681-18879-1-git-send-email-digetx@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1364 bytes --]
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> writes:
> udc->softconnect should be set regardless of the VBUS state, otherwise
> the USB peripheral device, connected during suspend, won't be detected
> since can_pullup() would return false and the UDC won't be enabled.
>
> Fixes: 252455c40316 (usb: gadget: fsl driver pullup fix)
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> V2: "(is_on != 0)" changed to "!!is_on" as per Sergei Shtylyov comment,
> cleaned up commit message.
>
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c
> index aab5221..4309b4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_udc_core.c
> @@ -1220,10 +1220,11 @@ static int fsl_pullup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, int is_on)
>
> udc = container_of(gadget, struct fsl_udc, gadget);
>
> + udc->softconnect = !!is_on;
> +
> if (!udc->vbus_active)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - udc->softconnect = (is_on != 0);
if we're suspended and VBUS was cut off, why would we keep softconnect
set to true ? That would also cause a discrepancy between SW state and
HW state.
I don't have this HW to test, but this patch seems wrong to me.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-25 15:11 [PATCH v2] usb: gadget: fsl_udc_core: Fix pullup status Dmitry Osipenko
2016-03-29 10:31 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-03-29 11:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2016-03-29 11:19 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87io05shhq.fsf@intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=digetx@gmail.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox