public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	Glen Turner <gdt@gdt.id.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] usbnet: fix bad header length bug
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:05:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iosn86en.fsf@nemi.mork.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392034947.2082.30.camel@linux-fkkt.site> (Oliver Neukum's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:22:27 +0100")

Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> writes:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Emil Goode wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 07:40:58AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
>> > Well, then how about simply removing the check?
>> > It seems to have outlived its usefulness.
>> > 
>> > 	Regards
>> > 		Oliver
>> > 
>> >
>> 
>> I did consider that and I think it is probably the best thing to do.
>> However, I think the removal of the check could have negative effects
>> on the other minidrivers, at least the qmi_wwan minidriver explicitly
>> states that it is depending on this check to be made in rx_complete().
>
> <censored>.

No need to do that.  I had the exact same reaction myself :-)

Anyway, I put that comment there mostly as a note to myself why the
check would be redundant at that point.  I don't see any problem with
removing the generic check in usbnet as long as we add similar checks
whereever they are needed, like in qmi_wwan.

Note that usbnet_skb_return will be one of those places.  It calls
eth_type_trans() on the skb, so it should verify that the length is at
least ETH_HLEN first.

> Oh well. But how about merging it with FLAG_MULTI_PACKET?
> I really don't want to add more flags. There is a point where enough
> flags make absurd having a common code. We are closing in on that point.

Agreed.  I would even say we are past that point...


Bjørn

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-09 23:06 [PATCH 1/2 v2] usbnet: fix bad header length bug Emil Goode
2014-02-09 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: asix: add missing flag to struct driver_info Emil Goode
2014-02-10  6:40 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] usbnet: fix bad header length bug Oliver Neukum
2014-02-10 12:00   ` Emil Goode
2014-02-10 12:22     ` Oliver Neukum
2014-02-10 12:39       ` David Laight
2014-02-10 13:05       ` Bjørn Mork [this message]
2014-02-10 15:54         ` Emil Goode
2014-02-11  7:43           ` Oliver Neukum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iosn86en.fsf@nemi.mork.no \
    --to=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=broonie@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emilgoode@gmail.com \
    --cc=gdt@gdt.id.au \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox