linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Arvid Brodin <Arvid.Brodin@xdin.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: fs/proc/base.c: text md5sums; tgid vs tid; and INF vs ONE?
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:45:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ip9refzk.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50904066.4060404@xdin.com> (Arvid Brodin's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:02:33 +0000")

Arvid Brodin <Arvid.Brodin@xdin.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Below is a patch that adds a file /proc/PID/text_md5sum which when read returns the md5
> checksum of a process' text segment. (This would be used e.g. to make sure a process'
> code hasn't been tampered with.)
>
> However, I have a few questions:
>
> * What's the difference between the tgid_base_stuff and tid_base_stuff arrays? (One for
> processes and one for the process' threads? I haven't been able to find any info about
> this so I'm guessing.)

Yes.  One for thread groups and one for threads.

> * When should I use the INF ("read") vs the ONE ("show") macro?

proc_read depends on the caller to allocate a 4k buffer, instead of
sizing the buffer based upon the size of the text being written.  Which
makes proc_read an error prone and ultimately deprecated way of handling
things.

Using some variant on seq_file is preferred for new files.

> * Any other comments about the code?

There are known successful attacks against md5 so using md5 for
something new and security related is a bad idea.

Userspace can just as easily compute a security hash itself you don't
need kernel support.


I recommend you checkout the code in security/ima/ looks like it can
already do what you are trying to do.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-30 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-30 21:02 fs/proc/base.c: text md5sums; tgid vs tid; and INF vs ONE? Arvid Brodin
2012-10-30 21:22 ` Al Viro
2012-11-01 20:22   ` Arvid Brodin
2012-10-30 21:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-10-30 22:45 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2012-11-01 20:29   ` Arvid Brodin
2012-11-02 22:49     ` Arvid Brodin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ip9refzk.fsf@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=Arvid.Brodin@xdin.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).