public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus <paulus@samba.org>,
	stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:22:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iq56yr5s.fsf@linux-g6p1.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100624142804.431553874@chello.nl>

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:28:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> These patches prepare the perf code for multiple pmus (no user
> interface yet, Lin Ming is working on that). These patches remove all
> weak functions and rework the struct pmu interface.
> 
> The patches are boot tested on x86_64 and compile tested on: powerpc
> (!fsl, what config is that?), sparc and arm (sorry no SH compiler)

Hi Peter,

I tried your SH changes and I needed to apply this patch to get it to
compile. I haven't run the code yet, but I'll do that later today.

---

diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
index 50ff852..6bfbaec 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void sh_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 }
 
-static int sh_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
+static int sh_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void sh_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 	sh_perf_event_update(event, &event->hw, event->hw.idx);
 }
 
-static in sh_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
+static int sh_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	int err = __hw_perf_event_init(event);
 	if (unlikely(err)) {
@@ -345,15 +345,15 @@ sh_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
-int __cpuinit register_sh_pmu(struct sh_pmu *pmu)
+int __cpuinit register_sh_pmu(struct sh_pmu *_pmu)
 {
 	if (sh_pmu)
 		return -EBUSY;
-	sh_pmu = pmu;
+	sh_pmu = _pmu;
 
-	pr_info("Performance Events: %s support registered\n", pmu->name);
+	pr_info("Performance Events: %s support registered\n", _pmu->name);
 
-	WARN_ON(pmu->num_events > MAX_HWEVENTS);
+	WARN_ON(_pmu->num_events > MAX_HWEVENTS);
 
 	perf_pmu_register(&pmu);
 	perf_cpu_notifier(sh_pmu_notifier);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-26 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-24 14:28 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf, x86: Fix Nehalem PMU quirk Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf: Fix argument of perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf, sparc64: Fix maybe_change_configuration() PCR setting Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] perf: deconstify struct pmu Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] perf: register pmu implementations Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-28 13:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-28 15:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-28 15:29       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-07-09  3:08   ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-09  8:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] perf: Unindent labels Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] perf: Reduce perf_disable() usage Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] perf: Per PMU disable Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-09  7:31   ` Paul Mackerras
2010-07-09  8:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf: Default PMU ops Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 14:49   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 14:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:00       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 14:58   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 14:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:03       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 16:34         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:07           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 18:09             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:11               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 18:19                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:21                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf: Shrink hw_perf_event Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:06   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-24 14:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] perf: Rework the PMU methods Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 15:37   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-29 16:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-29 18:09       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-06-25 11:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/11] perf pmu interface -v2 Will Deacon
2010-06-25 11:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-25 14:36     ` Will Deacon
2010-06-25 14:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 14:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 15:02           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 15:31             ` MattFleming
2010-07-01 15:39               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-01 16:04                 ` Matt Fleming
2010-07-02  2:57                 ` Paul Mundt
2010-07-02  9:52                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-05 11:14                     ` Paul Mundt
2010-07-08 11:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-07-08 11:19                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-18 19:37                     ` Matt Fleming
2010-07-02 12:55           ` Will Deacon
2010-06-26 11:22 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2010-06-26 16:22 ` Corey Ashford
2010-06-28 15:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-30 17:19     ` Corey Ashford
2010-06-30 18:11       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iq56yr5s.fsf@linux-g6p1.site \
    --to=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox