* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-04 17:27 [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description KOSAKI Motohiro
@ 2008-11-04 19:36 ` Chris Snook
2008-11-06 22:51 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-04 20:11 ` Pekka Enberg
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chris Snook @ 2008-11-04 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KOSAKI Motohiro; +Cc: LKML
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> So, following changes are better.
>
> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
> o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer, but also Intel Core7i has it.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
a) It's Core i7, not Core 7i
b) Core i7 is, at least so far, the single-socket version, so NUMA
doesn't apply.
I think we should let Intel write the CONFIG_NUMA description for
Nehalem processors.
-- Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-04 19:36 ` Chris Snook
@ 2008-11-06 22:51 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2008-11-06 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Snook; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, LKML
Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> writes:
> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
>> So, following changes are better.
>> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
>> o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer, but also Intel Core7i has it.
>> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> a) It's Core i7, not Core 7i
> b) Core i7 is, at least so far, the single-socket version, so NUMA
> doesn't apply.
>
> I think we should let Intel write the CONFIG_NUMA description for
> Nehalem processors.
The recommendation should be imho just to always enable it. Back
when I wrote the description it was still experimental, but
it really isn't anymore.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-04 17:27 [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-04 19:36 ` Chris Snook
@ 2008-11-04 20:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-06 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 22:50 ` Andi Kleen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2008-11-04 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KOSAKI Motohiro; +Cc: LKML
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:27 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> So, following changes are better.
>
> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
> Index: b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig 2008-11-05 01:11:24.000000000 +0900
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig 2008-11-05 02:09:38.000000000 +0900
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>
> # Common NUMA Features
> config NUMA
> - bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> + bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> depends on SMP
> depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
You might want to remove the dependency to CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL as well.
> default n if X86_PC
> @@ -964,9 +964,8 @@ config NUMA
>
> For 32-bit this is currently highly experimental and should be only
> used for kernel development. It might also cause boot failures.
> - For 64-bit this is recommended on all multiprocessor Opteron systems.
> - If the system is EM64T, you should say N unless your system is
> - EM64T NUMA.
> + For 64-bit this is recommended if the system is Intel Core 7i or later or AMD Opteron.
> + Otherwise, you should say N unless your system is EM64T NUMA.
>
> comment "NUMA (Summit) requires SMP, 64GB highmem support, ACPI"
> depends on X86_32 && X86_SUMMIT && (!HIGHMEM64G || !ACPI)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-04 17:27 [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-04 19:36 ` Chris Snook
2008-11-04 20:11 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2008-11-06 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 10:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-07 22:13 ` Chris Snook
2008-11-06 22:50 ` Andi Kleen
3 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-06 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KOSAKI Motohiro; +Cc: LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> So, following changes are better.
>
> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL o Opteron is not the only
> processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer, but also Intel
> Core7i has it.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
applied to tip/x86/doc, thanks! I've updated a few other details as
well, see the final commit below.
Ingo
------------->
>From fd51b2d7d5df932767b89e00d0871a38a2c53e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:27:19 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] x86: update CONFIG_NUMA description
Impact: clarify/update CONFIG_NUMA text
CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
So, following changes are better.
o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer,
but also Intel Core7i has it.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 350bee1..38ae04b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -951,22 +951,26 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
# Common NUMA Features
config NUMA
- bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
depends on SMP
depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
default n if X86_PC
default y if (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP)
help
Enable NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) support.
+
The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the
local memory controller of the CPU and add some more
NUMA awareness to the kernel.
- For 32-bit this is currently highly experimental and should be only
- used for kernel development. It might also cause boot failures.
- For 64-bit this is recommended on all multiprocessor Opteron systems.
- If the system is EM64T, you should say N unless your system is
- EM64T NUMA.
+ For 64-bit this is recommended if the system is Intel Core 7i
+ (or later), AMD Opteron, or EM64T NUMA.
+
+ For 32-bit this is only needed on (rare) 32-bit-only platforms
+ that support NUMA topologies, such as NUMAQ / Summit, or if you
+ boot a 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit NUMA platform.
+
+ Otherwise, you should say N.
comment "NUMA (Summit) requires SMP, 64GB highmem support, ACPI"
depends on X86_32 && X86_SUMMIT && (!HIGHMEM64G || !ACPI)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-06 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-11-06 10:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-06 10:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-06 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-07 22:13 ` Chris Snook
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2008-11-06 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> From fd51b2d7d5df932767b89e00d0871a38a2c53e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:27:19 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: update CONFIG_NUMA description
>
> Impact: clarify/update CONFIG_NUMA text
>
> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> So, following changes are better.
>
> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
>
> o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer,
> but also Intel Core7i has it.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 350bee1..38ae04b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -951,22 +951,26 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>
> # Common NUMA Features
> config NUMA
> - bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> + bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> depends on SMP
> depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
Why does this depend on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL still?
> default n if X86_PC
> default y if (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP)
> help
> Enable NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) support.
> +
> The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the
> local memory controller of the CPU and add some more
> NUMA awareness to the kernel.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-06 10:15 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2008-11-06 10:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-06 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2008-11-06 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg; +Cc: kosaki.motohiro, Ingo Molnar, LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > From fd51b2d7d5df932767b89e00d0871a38a2c53e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:27:19 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: update CONFIG_NUMA description
> >
> > Impact: clarify/update CONFIG_NUMA text
> >
> > CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> > So, following changes are better.
> >
> > o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
> >
> > o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer,
> > but also Intel Core7i has it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 350bee1..38ae04b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -951,22 +951,26 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> >
> > # Common NUMA Features
> > config NUMA
> > - bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > + bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> > depends on SMP
> > depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
>
> Why does this depend on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL still?
sorry, late resoponce.
In fact, x86_32 numa is still experimental.
and x86_64 is already NOT experimental.
So, I think depend-on don't need change.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-06 10:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-06 10:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
@ 2008-11-06 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-06 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > From fd51b2d7d5df932767b89e00d0871a38a2c53e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:27:19 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: update CONFIG_NUMA description
> >
> > Impact: clarify/update CONFIG_NUMA text
> >
> > CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> > So, following changes are better.
> >
> > o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
> >
> > o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer,
> > but also Intel Core7i has it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 350bee1..38ae04b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -951,22 +951,26 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> >
> > # Common NUMA Features
> > config NUMA
> > - bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> > + bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> > depends on SMP
> > depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
>
> Why does this depend on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL still?
Good point, i've just removed that too. 32-bit NUMA used to have
stability problems (nobody really tested it systematically), but we've
fixed those bugs and can now remove the restrictions in v2.6.29.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-06 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 10:15 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2008-11-07 22:13 ` Chris Snook
2008-11-08 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-09 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chris Snook @ 2008-11-07 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
>> So, following changes are better.
>>
>> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL o Opteron is not the only
>> processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer, but also Intel
>> Core7i has it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 7 +++----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> applied to tip/x86/doc, thanks! I've updated a few other details as
> well, see the final commit below.
>
> Ingo
>
> ------------->
> From fd51b2d7d5df932767b89e00d0871a38a2c53e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:27:19 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: update CONFIG_NUMA description
>
> Impact: clarify/update CONFIG_NUMA text
>
> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> So, following changes are better.
>
> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
>
> o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer,
> but also Intel Core7i has it.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 350bee1..38ae04b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -951,22 +951,26 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
>
> # Common NUMA Features
> config NUMA
> - bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> + bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
> depends on SMP
> depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
> default n if X86_PC
> default y if (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP)
> help
> Enable NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) support.
> +
> The kernel will try to allocate memory used by a CPU on the
> local memory controller of the CPU and add some more
> NUMA awareness to the kernel.
>
> - For 32-bit this is currently highly experimental and should be only
> - used for kernel development. It might also cause boot failures.
> - For 64-bit this is recommended on all multiprocessor Opteron systems.
> - If the system is EM64T, you should say N unless your system is
> - EM64T NUMA.
> + For 64-bit this is recommended if the system is Intel Core 7i
> + (or later), AMD Opteron, or EM64T NUMA.
> +
> + For 32-bit this is only needed on (rare) 32-bit-only platforms
> + that support NUMA topologies, such as NUMAQ / Summit, or if you
> + boot a 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit NUMA platform.
> +
> + Otherwise, you should say N.
>
> comment "NUMA (Summit) requires SMP, 64GB highmem support, ACPI"
> depends on X86_32 && X86_SUMMIT && (!HIGHMEM64G || !ACPI)
Core i7, not Core 7i.
-- Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-07 22:13 ` Chris Snook
@ 2008-11-08 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-09 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-08 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Snook; +Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro, LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
* Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:
>> + For 32-bit this is only needed on (rare) 32-bit-only platforms
>> + that support NUMA topologies, such as NUMAQ / Summit, or if you
>> + boot a 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit NUMA platform.
>> +
>> + Otherwise, you should say N.
>> comment "NUMA (Summit) requires SMP, 64GB highmem support, ACPI"
>> depends on X86_32 && X86_SUMMIT && (!HIGHMEM64G || !ACPI)
>
> Core i7, not Core 7i.
fixed that, thanks!
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-07 22:13 ` Chris Snook
2008-11-08 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-11-09 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: KOSAKI Motohiro @ 2008-11-09 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Snook; +Cc: kosaki.motohiro, Ingo Molnar, LKML, the arch/x86 maintainers
> > + For 64-bit this is recommended if the system is Intel Core 7i
> > + (or later), AMD Opteron, or EM64T NUMA.
> > +
> > + For 32-bit this is only needed on (rare) 32-bit-only platforms
> > + that support NUMA topologies, such as NUMAQ / Summit, or if you
> > + boot a 32-bit kernel on a 64-bit NUMA platform.
> > +
> > + Otherwise, you should say N.
> >
> > comment "NUMA (Summit) requires SMP, 64GB highmem support, ACPI"
> > depends on X86_32 && X86_SUMMIT && (!HIGHMEM64G || !ACPI)
>
> Core i7, not Core 7i.
Good catch.
Tanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description
2008-11-04 17:27 [PATCH] change CONFIG_NUMA description KOSAKI Motohiro
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-06 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-11-06 22:50 ` Andi Kleen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2008-11-06 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: KOSAKI Motohiro; +Cc: LKML
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
> CONFIG_NUMA description talk about a bit old thing.
> So, following changes are better.
>
> o CONFIG_NUMA is no longer EXPERIMENTAL
> o Opteron is not the only processor of NUMA topology on x86_64 no longer, but also Intel Core7i has it.
Actually it doesn't have it. Core i7 systems are single socket and therefore
not NUMA.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread