From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-02.galae.net (smtpout-02.galae.net [185.246.84.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 700B924886A for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783005482; cv=none; b=fLmYs7yJrwJb+X7QP2eHm71OpVeSdFvBXyRFYU6Bogp5JmhS3S8wk1cIu1kcTUSFiM3iCl6H6AtcBDYDL4QWFUP9F8uMEXSrqRRKDvcrKIW7cc/BgYlYh6EaOL/gbnWqdan+plLqoMvcx9OdCBUkvfhhWqbKMjPQVsHNpLySzEs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783005482; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XJcp/jSBxeHnFxrM6Rs3ULcVX0u98ZwkSzH0A0tofRQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LdTjAwBeOc/I5j5LLJoP4UrFNz3z8Pq+nNVe948E4maXkPqYqZgIYmQk3Ityuyt0PtosgpSemNHEjtwa8L7JOa4bVtvEyCp+MLkDIxJyi0Sgbm0/FZF7thD/uwk71UqUVgO9NmGKbRgkMao0pPC9JgfYEyGPO8b5F3Ah65+RNbE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=rIN9Btpx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.84.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="rIN9Btpx" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-02.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF751A0DE6; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 893D65FF03; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 67BA1104C9546; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 17:17:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1783005477; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=XJcp/jSBxeHnFxrM6Rs3ULcVX0u98ZwkSzH0A0tofRQ=; b=rIN9BtpxUv4teVWCSx1I107Y3zq2MvLk0RZjpMpBisN7vaAU/MxKtQbIxqQ+hBjoysaBcn P08T3sE+OW7ZVYwn8RA+CFsRTfSkbAN1ZikRpQHgtabhc/XWZCRca7WoY+K8TcSXsD7HUr vvUmFC9hQFmuiCTbZf91T2c+fD1ccfGGv2bK66vB64Htv+E1OLA4ZUOjZEll3LSvBrWanC 7xQpsVm83p2mGeZyDBdMpE83J9tKqefguQ59i7l9GEqfca3vshfz5ed9CwoQvuJA/1q07m Lqar07NW2Y9YoZEyJIajHYyiEh/KDY/5jPpxbfyFsOYmPsaLcpOSI66bIxiGxA== From: Miquel Raynal To: Michael Walle Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Takahiro Kuwano , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Tudor Ambarus , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: Rework flash parameter initialization In-Reply-To: <20260601125438.3481722-1-mwalle@kernel.org> (Michael Walle's message of "Mon, 1 Jun 2026 14:52:42 +0200") References: <20260601125438.3481722-1-mwalle@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 30.2 Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 17:17:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87jyrdpgik.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello, > This might have the consequence that all the flashes now get a > RDSFPD opcode which might be an unknown opcode. But that was already > the case for any flashes which were unknown to the linux kernel. So > far, there was not a single complaint. > > See patch 3 for more information. If feedback is positive, this is > intended to be applied to the spi-nor tree after the next merge > window, so it will sit around in -next for quite some time and get > some testing. Tested-by: Miquel Raynal Tested with a Winbond W25Q02JVFIM. If you can also give a try to my QER rework I would be interested to gather feedback on it and ideally also try to merge this kind of rework early in the cycle. ;) Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l