From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B57FF282F16 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774013746; cv=none; b=TlPXPkaEUVIJnPZHl3I5jkrn/sYe83mVp3ZIzrXv0VfLAM3caQVBJkk7BXNwoP8d9KO2+wVZ21D97gLgMMj9bpGX9BdhA3hkNM6/qG5EXGH0LDQjfHQKe0PlZefxFIawU7c/OGoA6U1SSUwQcUiNg7scjdw59Gcm3ywsxBaXabE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774013746; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e80gbV9mt05SfdLSdPMkLi5uD5XvvL9lzz/PDXanG1g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vBquWo3qPV2bm+R/7aGradpEj0Wlp/adp4GAeFp7PbYZGUjtK29MRP7UOG2BtpX5CFshCKetL71/l4suefBawMPAy9m4ovXQFKJLR7CdHakaw7MPy32aBUG9RGjYIXnGCR/YgP7yF1AgNyMt/xpaxQleUJZYSvpT0XUzIQCbfHQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HSPI64KN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HSPI64KN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 371F7C2BCB0; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:35:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774013746; bh=e80gbV9mt05SfdLSdPMkLi5uD5XvvL9lzz/PDXanG1g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=HSPI64KNDE9vB7nTrZBIHWwXbQ2bcm3SEcfzU5KK39n6SPBei9KGE5cSt8Vpd2BSC G5Sh61nz2QFcy+KKRnNG3SCp6v48hRCWLjFVSGluWABsI/pitUakoDyvFmzDK34/32 E50Kg99dZhtRHK0NIeXgfqy8fNKEdcD8ZCQvkC0rKZwjl0wG12B9ml0lc8uMrCnyJA vpWW/a4ASSWJgXyXkAXEP0iFHcDYz/vnXjeQu2tMTzY5JynzIVxNVE8GmajMvniAy2 +GOjfo9D0YaYXl5fQ5iDukg4r9pHo94TdrWZKT6jS/eMWi7MeAushTWmU0ChN0kCBZ FuBB/uGnMDrXQ== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , =?utf-8?Q?Andr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Almeida , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Carlos O'Donell , Peter Zijlstra , Florian Weimer , Rich Felker , Torvald Riegel , Darren Hart , Ingo Molnar , Davidlohr Bueso , Arnd Bergmann , "Liam R . Howlett" , Uros Bizjak , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= Subject: Re: [patch v2 09/11] futex: Provide infrastructure to plug the non contended robust futex unlock race In-Reply-To: <20260319231239.749930268@kernel.org> References: <20260319225224.853416463@kernel.org> <20260319231239.749930268@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 14:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87jyv6k4i9.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Mar 20 2026 at 00:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK > +void __futex_fixup_robust_unlock(struct pt_regs *regs, struct futex_unlock_cs_range *csr) > +{ > + void __user *pop = arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(regs); > + > + if (!pop) > + return; > + > + futex_robust_list_clear_pending(pop, csr->cs_pop_size32 ? FLAGS_ROBUST_LIST32 : 0); That needs to be futex_robust_list_clear_pending(pop, csr->pop_size32 ? FLAGS_ROBUST_LIST32 : 0); Somehow that fixup was lost on the devel machine. Fixed in the git tree. Thanks, tglx