From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF1E30595B for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771915973; cv=none; b=VzM7Jw8m2H7nQvBVSu1Ozoiq2A1QnEIZOZCC+PjYjfsRaqANJIsn6TnUXeP2AytEvUtbhtjcOXqFr8s+WW+JIRPvd0a8w2m34GrHI7sU2OLI9J1MuAvXQ8RM7e21wowDwS5KCDrMFEfOKmXLzgeMXPSf8PG0pwTtTeHYUCsNkFs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771915973; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aCu4SGTZ0u7PvY1QpTVV6+nX9QunCxrpSU1ytfQX0wQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jfxp4P4de91d+PtbssgqTUzlG7yxztLIU9NJ5DpEfJqWzo3ZdUT2lgjcCEWFJP29vOJo+rj96WDs3/9mM5eOPFMz8y8FnOHbXSXK2Mb3xTGAscGCjyeo3iYQaUpzIYa3KzAZuMeMLSafPnost+bHiWqlwfdBUCmNb7Qck5Gaz54= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qc5YGYUS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qc5YGYUS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DE8BC19424; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:52:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771915973; bh=aCu4SGTZ0u7PvY1QpTVV6+nX9QunCxrpSU1ytfQX0wQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qc5YGYUStAEoFm4R/vACZO7CmlUB7OtzCPVDthis/63rdRkb0x36arLCbf1FceUCa KVb/9qRT5em4Qff50w0RGtmUbJziREpp596TVFs3LX1gEzGtPBpsyUELFU1LVH57Bq AlHYyRRD2UMKv/N5a0xaPtPQdMiK1WFk9M7q9vXqBXyAO7T3GPitiRHBSCpiqDMbse Bohia8HTR4/BE9qqYPwT73K8CTFXeAopfCPME3bphaKGUMcnKnX2Gy0Y9djGry7c5f Z85mGC1xF9cfUYHIwRqPTt9IsnmAVwvWA0A/7lnb9iTRVdODW4LVKM6h3HUCF4ABvD orCXkQBMpU7Fw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Ioana Ciornei , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add fsl_mc device plumbing to the msi-parent handling In-Reply-To: <86o6lfa936.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20260218135203.2267907-1-maz@kernel.org> <20260218135203.2267907-4-maz@kernel.org> <87seasv11z.ffs@tglx> <86qzqbal69.wl-maz@kernel.org> <87pl5vvchx.ffs@tglx> <86o6lfa936.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 07:52:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87jyw2vdj2.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Feb 23 2026 at 13:22, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 13:02:50 +0000, > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 23 2026 at 09:01, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> > On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:57:44 +0000, >> > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> This rejects as you are building against an unmerged change (I assume >> >> it's Lorenzos GIC5 stuff). I can fix it up when applying. >> > >> > That was against vanilla 6.19. I'll rebase on -rc1 to satisfy myself >> > that this is still doing the right thing after the ACPI crap fest, and >> > repost the result. >> >> Ah. The other way round :) >> >> My resolution is simple and it looks about right. Please note the >> cosmetic changes I did on the way :) > > Yup, looks good to me. And yes, moving the include up is the right > thing to do. > > I have another small change in my current stack that also drops > DOMAIN_BUS_FSL_MC_MSI from include/linux/irqdomain_defs.h. Could be > folded into patch #5. Just resend the pile.