From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B46B62C158E; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763747196; cv=none; b=OMSIgc7RwFXhxJQ/FYDrmslPDzCJNDOQ6KBgyZInbUcViFybcFr2hP33JGq5m6tmdR8pb3aXpHVyPamDYvgeHDMo2sJH8VRtIJefEfg+lZivFBcSH1gj7l8eDksZmNWE9KD9E+Ct2ypT2okudOS+0t3JA50wNagk8YcEN0LzA9c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763747196; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6mWB4qUkZK6e8iVP5ICPmPdtJcEeeWQiqW5Tsns0VJU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=R6ekr3j5ydhRztPIcgpoCC6x5WmATb13hnWqG3fesOQc2vSESV12JG5vCi+uMQcGnQxILZWy9urY9xEs+EELQTj1cZYlEM2mO3802Y1UZCqGgr+HjG16JHJt5Iu5HmbHDfiSp/0ygiJCsUKV2ZnlmwBvvQpWIWfRIakgMP4Fnao= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=E3UTHJ3j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="E3UTHJ3j" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net A6DA840C3E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1763747193; bh=joksVA4p0XaMBDEk9OI+LqnkRUne5obGA5skhqn96zo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=E3UTHJ3jilgnkuCCWKRCBUxL1gTTN7jxODDOB+GtOl9fWkSqWYats3nsiRpfkZBUO v8tGRtJlAfKmAkex1UtzHx+C7ILtnax9yxPBhGIaVpcJmtwRQ4q/PAzeyjUMSpJ1BI wqAyUkfnY7tQetQldtLS5yrArA+bXdTtrRIZoOoamhGdu4bLCPeVXAU/o34N7SyJcd Nab0tgpQOBX09wtsmu46DRtsJZtJhhmUOYXenaRehkQSiUUo76Zp2H6AaAN97RxX18 w4YnfGpAcUQmxgOwVaQCxemS1R10aWtiiFyx/kimI8ge1GmtOK6VYqhoJvwDt0nUpG OmlrYegvywwGw== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6DA840C3E; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 17:46:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Convert get_feat to Python In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:46:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87jyzjth1j.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: So you had me worried with this: > As we don't have a definition yet for the location of the Python > libraries yet, I opted to place the parse features library inside > tools/docs/lib. It shouldn't be hard to move it elsewhere once we > define a better place for them. But it seems that you did, in fact, update the library location. I've applied these, thanks. jon