public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	 KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	 Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,  Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,  Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Fix OOB handling
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 11:49:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz1uu5zb.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905-redir-test-pass-drop-v1-2-9d9e43ff40df@rbox.co> (Michal Luczaj's message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2025 13:11:42 +0200")

Sorry for the super-long time-to-feedback.

On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 01:11 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> In some test cases, OOB packets might have been left unread. Flush them out
> and introduce additional checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> index c1bf1076e8152b7d83c3e07e2dce746b5a39cf7e..4997e72c14345b274367f3f2f4115c39d1ae48c9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,19 @@ static void handle_unsupported(int sd_send, int sd_peer, int sd_in, int sd_out,
>  			FAIL_ERRNO("unsupported: packet missing, retval=%zd", n);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* af_unix send("ab", MSG_OOB) spits out 2 packets, but only the latter
> +	 * ("b") is designated OOB. If the peer is in a sockmap, the OOB packet
> +	 * will be silently dropped. Otherwise OOB stays in the queue and should
> +	 * be taken care of.
> +	 */
> +	if ((send_flags & MSG_OOB) && !pass && !drop) {

Nit: There's a similar check a few lines before that:

	if (pass == 0 && drop == 0 && (status & UNSUPPORTED_RACY_VERD)) {

For readability it might make sense to introduce a helper flag:

        bool no_verdict = !pass && !drop; /* prog didn't run */

> +		errno = 0;
> +		n = recv_timeout(sd_peer, &recv_buf, 1, MSG_OOB, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
> +		/* Ignore unsupported sk_msg error */
> +		if (n != 1 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
> +			FAIL_ERRNO("recv(OOB): retval=%zd", n);
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Ensure queues are empty */
>  	fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_send)", sd_send, 0);
>  	if (sd_in != sd_send)
> @@ -192,6 +205,9 @@ static void handle_unsupported(int sd_send, int sd_peer, int sd_in, int sd_out,
>  	fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_out)", sd_out, 0);
>  	if (sd_recv != sd_out)
>  		fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_recv)", sd_recv, 0);
> +
> +	fail_recv("recv(sd_peer, OOB)", sd_peer, MSG_OOB);
> +	fail_recv("recv(sd_out, OOB)", sd_out, MSG_OOB);
>  }
>  
>  static void test_send_redir_recv(int sd_send, int send_flags, int sd_peer,

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-19  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05 11:11 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] selftests/bpf: Extend sockmap_redir to test no-redir SK_DROP/SK_PASS Michal Luczaj
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Simplify try_recv() Michal Luczaj
2025-09-09  9:51   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-09 10:15     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-09 21:25       ` Michal Luczaj
2025-09-10  9:43         ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Fix OOB handling Michal Luczaj
2025-09-05 11:19   ` Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19 11:29     ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-19  9:49   ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Rename functions Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19  9:54   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Let test specify skel's redirect_type Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19  9:55   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Support no-redirect SK_DROP/SK_PASS Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19 11:28   ` Jakub Sitnicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jz1uu5zb.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mhal@rbox.co \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox