From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Fix OOB handling
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 11:49:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz1uu5zb.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905-redir-test-pass-drop-v1-2-9d9e43ff40df@rbox.co> (Michal Luczaj's message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2025 13:11:42 +0200")
Sorry for the super-long time-to-feedback.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 01:11 PM +02, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> In some test cases, OOB packets might have been left unread. Flush them out
> and introduce additional checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> index c1bf1076e8152b7d83c3e07e2dce746b5a39cf7e..4997e72c14345b274367f3f2f4115c39d1ae48c9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_redir.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,19 @@ static void handle_unsupported(int sd_send, int sd_peer, int sd_in, int sd_out,
> FAIL_ERRNO("unsupported: packet missing, retval=%zd", n);
> }
>
> + /* af_unix send("ab", MSG_OOB) spits out 2 packets, but only the latter
> + * ("b") is designated OOB. If the peer is in a sockmap, the OOB packet
> + * will be silently dropped. Otherwise OOB stays in the queue and should
> + * be taken care of.
> + */
> + if ((send_flags & MSG_OOB) && !pass && !drop) {
Nit: There's a similar check a few lines before that:
if (pass == 0 && drop == 0 && (status & UNSUPPORTED_RACY_VERD)) {
For readability it might make sense to introduce a helper flag:
bool no_verdict = !pass && !drop; /* prog didn't run */
> + errno = 0;
> + n = recv_timeout(sd_peer, &recv_buf, 1, MSG_OOB, IO_TIMEOUT_SEC);
> + /* Ignore unsupported sk_msg error */
> + if (n != 1 && errno != EOPNOTSUPP)
> + FAIL_ERRNO("recv(OOB): retval=%zd", n);
> + }
> +
> /* Ensure queues are empty */
> fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_send)", sd_send, 0);
> if (sd_in != sd_send)
> @@ -192,6 +205,9 @@ static void handle_unsupported(int sd_send, int sd_peer, int sd_in, int sd_out,
> fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_out)", sd_out, 0);
> if (sd_recv != sd_out)
> fail_recv("bpf.recv(sd_recv)", sd_recv, 0);
> +
> + fail_recv("recv(sd_peer, OOB)", sd_peer, MSG_OOB);
> + fail_recv("recv(sd_out, OOB)", sd_out, MSG_OOB);
> }
>
> static void test_send_redir_recv(int sd_send, int send_flags, int sd_peer,
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 11:11 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] selftests/bpf: Extend sockmap_redir to test no-redir SK_DROP/SK_PASS Michal Luczaj
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Simplify try_recv() Michal Luczaj
2025-09-09 9:51 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-09 10:15 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-09 21:25 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-09-10 9:43 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Fix OOB handling Michal Luczaj
2025-09-05 11:19 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19 11:29 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-19 9:49 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Rename functions Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19 9:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Let test specify skel's redirect_type Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19 9:55 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2025-09-05 11:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: sockmap_redir: Support no-redirect SK_DROP/SK_PASS Michal Luczaj
2025-09-19 11:28 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jz1uu5zb.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox