public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Warning/trace in kernel/smp.c:815 smp_call_function_many_cond
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:33:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz9ff2pc.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99c7bdb6-76e3-42ce-9a0d-c5b72a2c132a@paulmck-laptop>

On Mon, Feb 24 2025 at 06:57, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:57:40PM +0100, Christian Heusel wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> I have noticed the following new warning in my dmesg output, I think I
>> have first seen this when upgrading to v6.14-rc1.
>> 
>> So far I have been unsuccessfull in bisecting it, therefore it would be
>> nice to get some input whether this is something serious or how I could
>> debug it further. I have also attached a full dmesg for more context.
>> 
>>     ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>     WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at kernel/smp.c:815 smp_call_function_many_cond+0x46b/0x4c0
>
> This happens when something invokes one of the smp_call_function()
> APIs not in task context, that is, if it is called from NMI, hard IRQ,
> or soft IRQ contexts.
>
> Which it is in this case, due to clocksource_watchdog() being invoked
> from a timer handler.  This only matters if the clocksource is being
> marked unstable, which is what you are seeing.
>
> One possible fix is to move the call to cs->mark_unstable(cs) from
> __clocksource_unstable() to clocksource_watchdog_work().  This would
> require marking the clocksource so that clocksource_watchdog_work()
> could find it.
>
> But is there a better way?

That's fine and should be trivial to do. This business is asynchronous
anyway, so it does not matter much when the unstable call is a bit
delayed.

Thanks,

        tglx


      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 13:57 Warning/trace in kernel/smp.c:815 smp_call_function_many_cond Christian Heusel
2025-02-24 14:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-24 21:33   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jz9ff2pc.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=christian@heusel.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox