From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89BAF18C31; Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737309812; cv=none; b=hNqmq9CsGQNM+mbncPxth1Ei8teAhIqTysQ3edgwPhHAv/ddnU2GDlHPcNHv7QTPjU1cyWUhs8xQ2Ck8LzPSV6ato97VV3zkY32exgTRN2PCqb2XDRJVC8gE4nE/ILLIR4jKZ155oTN8C3+D4aYDGJb6S9PiGpm7gQFuAvpIplI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737309812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UdZB8usjolNBm6Itcfw3wDOuddAuD86PL6jZuLSyXoM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HX8D1eiXnVhHFt6dpZzh5uQWEQurtq5X2jYOGrqmCvZomXMlwvuOf8FWhLt6Mt1QGAx3jwuEPLvXf+eI+InCagA475qKzEyYDqqUmRI0j0Jpb98xKniI0Kn035CW0X3lbPDyftr9NS+5ctaiAWLY0SPidVdyz1EERJHmHidGbYU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=dexL6+Y3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="dexL6+Y3" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 9D97440403 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1737309803; bh=rVIUzW1WSj4xcEHdyt5swGhYoFavsFhRy8lWu9FZmxQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dexL6+Y3rxjMMFxY9htz9QcmmON6a+ZdQaG12jqBNTI5LrCuGa2ieJCkRzeLIXS7L FdRI0FJiTgHG4L9COZjMOPgQFgAX5C1x+d0ycsUMFd2w4wg/TEF6txliiecgiQKTiq 2El9OTHMSjCRQtg/ZS3e4yW4eL6qkuAnEfP9AWhkrrEuRJ7aMqdbbCPL4w0qjjaK++ xYMS7MAl0COhESgBvaBYZUUziYFYnTpo+HUf09kGL/NvPl+Mv/5+mNYcEaRKmylDyn hFQ5tGZVoffzOewYAQ8AwRUFLjmyX6/wT5MV2hHoPp6dsgs4vHuAn/P9sgSgryxmOd 13EucmpukqUow== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D97440403; Sun, 19 Jan 2025 18:03:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Carlos Bilbao , carlos.bilbao@kernel.org Cc: avadhut.naik@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mailmap, docs: Update email to carlos.bilbao@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <6c8457ca-c43c-4d93-8493-bf4e5b22f3df@gmail.com> References: <20250111161110.862131-1-carlos.bilbao@kernel.org> <87ikqiboqp.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <6c8457ca-c43c-4d93-8493-bf4e5b22f3df@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2025 11:03:22 -0700 Message-ID: <87jzaqvfyt.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Carlos Bilbao writes: > Hello, > > On 1/13/25 11:35, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> carlos.bilbao@kernel.org writes: >> >>> From: Carlos Bilbao >>> >>> Update .mailmap to reflect my new (and final) primary email address, >>> carlos.bilbao@kernel.org. This ensures consistent attribution in Git >>> history. Also update my contact information in file >>> Documentation/translations/sp_SP/index.rst to help contributors reach out >>> for Spanish translations. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao >>> --- >>> .mailmap | 3 +++ >>> Documentation/translations/sp_SP/index.rst | 2 +- >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap >>> index 5ff0e5d681e7..83837191affb 100644 >>> --- a/.mailmap >>> +++ b/.mailmap >>> @@ -140,6 +140,9 @@ Cai Huoqing >>> Can Guo >>> Carl Huang >>> Carlos Bilbao >> Is there a reason you didn't just delete the above line? > > > My understanding was that .mailmap should keep older mappings for proper > record keeping, but it may have had the same effect, yes. I'm confused, which records are we keeping here? It doesn't seem that mapping the same old address to multiple new ones will lead to anything good...? jon