From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0069B1DD0C7 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731700593; cv=none; b=nQZ0y+1V9gq6kyTyH0tGq3/FSC4Qhdpaf6Vp35J9/fJPa6ZUJFT6xni/J69uF+LU6zf3iFejPhA60W62ngCwYA6KG5WfLMqYIwpWB+S7Im6pTD/DjVjWDA9kJhY4Eei1UJxs52MCEu+hl8ZkjRE5XNcANDlKvIA6CmJYy4NY7mo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731700593; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hZ6Co4N3thBmRpA4ccL2c7pOVG/mJ2c9Ht9oLnIkdzU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iZeQu2p7nyclJADxuVj5zkRVFMmMkgZnnFjbprLfefUQjTyeop9Z1FlQFM5/uXXwAgrLcySNA4INelbCszDBlhyHxhrsnj8kcFYe1dktLv4928XyZUDMStLxmQYN3FjAt8j1J7dZWVdYj6rX0TSufEPcWjxx6g0RGLewR/QXHRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=XDbWp8i8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.193 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="XDbWp8i8" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01596240005; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:56:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1731700589; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7mNYmj6ni23Jqko1xtDRAMtam5EhBsgqdEbqnjiENf0=; b=XDbWp8i8JF47NcJG/C7twNY8eXASi6ybsjpo1jkIg6zozBQyheFJ+4vmRR5rGbrnNqbtDt cq6NoEdhqw0Ty1N6aSuPSwbb59OqxoFhQUNZNF1HsCKcaHMIC3B3SV0ijuXYxeIjExHJBy mSQP+RyJz9AIxLKqOMLeUYfT5qNVx414L3hSCBaA0zj6MV5dfpSKz8z52mCjWhdgT9iB+v 0Xi1Uafy925rS23lfO/vn+mPAKKu6Qq03Lwc1/EIsMSstyeTtNtBkhQwnFV8PC6k0KIMeW pU208kbhVfSJT50YH+FUfwQT/FVsmwD1WF60YM+oC1l9a/z96LGoFVw5RlLOWA== From: Miquel Raynal To: Bastien Curutchet Cc: Santosh Shilimkar , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Petazzoni , Herve Codina , Christopher Cordahi Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] memory: ti-aemif: Wrap CS timings into a struct In-Reply-To: <20241115132631.264609-4-bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com> (Bastien Curutchet's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:26:24 +0100") References: <20241115132631.264609-1-bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com> <20241115132631.264609-4-bastien.curutchet@bootlin.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.1; emacs 29.4 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:56:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzd4mftg.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com On 15/11/2024 at 14:26:24 +01, Bastien Curutchet wrote: > CS timings are store in the struct aemif_cs_data along with other CS > parameters. It isn't convenient for exposing CS timings to other drivers > without also exposing the other parameters. > > Wrap the CS timings in a new the struct aemif_cs_timings to simplify s/the// ^^^ > their export in upcoming patches. > > Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet But otherwise this feels very sensible. Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal