From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de>
Cc: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru>,
Wu Yunchuan <yunchuan@nfschina.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>,
<syzbot+1bc2c2afd44f820a669f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ar5523: enable proper endpoint verification
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:21:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzkgfjgf.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240428094916.3d1e92b8@mir> (Stefan Lippers-Hollmann's message of "Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:49:16 +0200")
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.l-h@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi
>
> On 2024-04-28, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> On 2024-04-25, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> > Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> writes:
>> > > Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru> wrote:
>> [...]
>> > > Does anyone have a real device to test this? I have had so much problems with
>> > > syzbot fixes in the past that I'm hesitant to take such patches without
>> > > testing.
>> >
>> > Actually should we just remove ar5523 driver? Has anyone heard anyone
>> > using this driver still?
>>
>> While I'm not using it regularly, the driver does still work in plain
>> v6.8.8 (and these Netgear WG111 and WG111T USB WLAN cards were quite
>> common), tested against a qcn5024 AP.
>>
>> I'm just preparing a new kernel build with the proposed patch applied.
>
> …and now the same with this patch applied:
>
> $ uname -r
> 6.9.0-rc5-gcc1380dd1882-dirty
>
> wireless-next-2024-04-24-2112-gcc1380dd1882 with
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240408121425.29392-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru/raw/
> applied
>
[...]
> [ 84.623413] wlx<MAC>: associated
Very nice, thanks for testing! I'm surprised that ar5523 still works :)
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 12:14 [PATCH v2] wifi: ar5523: enable proper endpoint verification Nikita Zhandarovich
2024-04-25 15:52 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-25 15:58 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-28 7:04 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2024-04-28 7:49 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2024-04-29 12:21 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2024-04-30 13:37 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jzkgfjgf.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru \
--cc=s.l-h@gmx.de \
--cc=syzbot+1bc2c2afd44f820a669f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=yunchuan@nfschina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox