From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AB691B94B; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706172318; cv=none; b=RAriFCyHrPp8tF7Xy5phOCRFwp0WNFRGOhzPDgVO/6b+IwP8MNttclmXyPVTOgr9/RGiemBTAw5criUfKm8auK4IXQcq1cWliyWP0WMhXVZRs96c1syusB+C/mlSs+G9u5XAxel4C+pj4d5m+7vvxrJMCkQn0JnSNhZFoq3mlDw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706172318; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8/N8nHgaQvKTBhfxwCmzbJX3QzXCprpMyk/c3leHg08=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g7eHy4Vf7oRZlVpJ26P4QBLxov/Qhq8w2IOdc4agdmbM/Z1p5vtg0TqTTt+o1AeMTH0bU3ikXESB0rdv86qyf0q+s1OY3eAhR9QsuTn/fFL+Pggexe8BOkEe6YTAyZx7Be+tLR/foLH9awfPuv9Pk3GFvp+ayyYR+4Ng4Q96ixU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RTux1+pR; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Pt+4Up3Z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RTux1+pR"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Pt+4Up3Z" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1706172309; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8/N8nHgaQvKTBhfxwCmzbJX3QzXCprpMyk/c3leHg08=; b=RTux1+pRR18Wian+HDI6adTZ/YAeMMLdG1s7PChn0t52OXX4/qt1+s6W+rlN5lGv8l1mAm uDImkHQhEwoMUSu27Qysj0N35xLmWQnLiminAaNU+kFEJYGBYkGERzGS8keWE2sIdnnhGL ReSi69T5FCAck/QCeHqxcqRVqPBTJ+Ux0ZYOh6zw4q7L2J0gnFRg7lq+4ZQBLOWReboZ6T Fhr2dClqzHYA1P28jSMsbKJ7gVOntd5+GRm1fM0KvmNsMB3Be69/s0XNhIIy2r9Lv8nhS1 K1IBGeJjkL/2y3s9NDfUupCpnv4CD1RPMvwhccE6mGIZ8mQ4/MAyUpVYf5tv9Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1706172309; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8/N8nHgaQvKTBhfxwCmzbJX3QzXCprpMyk/c3leHg08=; b=Pt+4Up3ZcUmLAxp2euhrRzuCu/V0OYU0xtyo6emPV1pORKWrqQqO7cbfKlPUiwy7H4DMKK UGaqX01fpuOb+RCQ== To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Tim Chen , Heiko Carstens , Ingo Molnar , Gerald Schaefer , Alexander Gordeev , Vasily Gorbik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tick-sched: Preserve number of idle sleeps across CPU hotplug events In-Reply-To: References: <20240122233534.3094238-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> <87v87ijzqj.ffs@tglx> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:45:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87jznxkdii.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 24 2024 at 21:11, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Le Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 08:30:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a =C3=A9crit : >> On Mon, Jan 22 2024 at 15:35, Tim Chen wrote: >>=20 >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commi= t/?id=3D71fee48fb772ac4f6cfa63dbebc5629de8b4cc09 >>=20 > > It's a different patch :-) I clearly can't read ....