public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, efault@gmx.de, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	mingo@kernel.org, song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: Remove redundant variable and fix incorrect type in build_sched_domains
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 12:56:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0d9510z.mognet@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220218162743.1134-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

On 18/02/22 21:57, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> While investigating the sparse warning reported by the LKP bot [1],
> observed that we have a redundant variable "top" in the function
> build_sched_domains that was introduced in the recent commit
> e496132ebedd ("sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when
> SD_NUMA spans multiple LLCs")
>
> The existing variable "sd" suffices which allows us to remove the
> redundant variable "top" while annotating the other variable "top_p"
> with the "__rcu" annotation to silence the sparse warning.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202202170853.9vofgC3O-lkp@intel.com/
>
> Fixes: e496132ebedd ("sched/fair: Adjust the allowed NUMA imbalance when SD_NUMA spans multiple LLCs")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/topology.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index e6cd55951304..4b757fb8f661 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
>
>                       if (!(sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES) && child &&
>                           (child->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
> -				struct sched_domain *top, *top_p;
> +				struct sched_domain __rcu *top_p;
>                               unsigned int nr_llcs;
>
>                               /*
> @@ -2280,11 +2280,9 @@ build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map, struct sched_domain_attr *att
>                               sd->imb_numa_nr = imb;
>
>                               /* Set span based on the first NUMA domain. */
> -				top = sd;
> -				top_p = top->parent;
> +				top_p = sd->parent;
>                               while (top_p && !(top_p->flags & SD_NUMA)) {
> -					top = top->parent;
> -					top_p = top->parent;
> +					top_p = top_p->parent;
>                               }
>                               imb_span = top_p ? top_p->span_weight : sd->span_weight;


So sd starts as the first domain without SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES (but its
direct child has it), and the loop searches upward for a NUMA domain. This
indeed shouldn't require two variables.

I was going to say that while you're at it, you could init top_p to sd
rather than sd->parent in case someone runs a non-default
sched_domain_topology[], but NODE should have neither
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES nor SD_NUMA, so that doesn't seem required.

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>

>                       } else {
> --
> 2.25.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-04 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-18 16:27 [PATCH] sched/topology: Remove redundant variable and fix incorrect type in build_sched_domains K Prateek Nayak
2022-03-04  3:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2022-03-04 12:56 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2022-03-04 13:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-08 22:25 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k0d9510z.mognet@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox