From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: NVME using PCI legacy interrupts only
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:06:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0n2qh38.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52371274-20bc-a150-a3ed-ba3e1305ad3e@gmail.com>
On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 19:43:57 +0100,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I found that on linux-next from June 8th my nvme disk is using legacy
> interrupts only. Some debugging lead me to irq_find_mapping() in
> msi_domain_alloc() returning -EEXIST.
>
> The nvme core first allocates a MSI-X interrupt for setup purposes
> and later frees it and allocates the final number of MSI-X interrupts.
>
> The following experimental change brought back the MSI-X interrupts.
> This makes me think that somehow freeing a MSI-X interrupt doesn't
> free it completely. I didn't see this behavior a few days ago,
> therefore I think it's related to the recent changes to
> irqdomain/genirq.
>
> Didn't do a bisect yet, maybe you have an idea already.
Yeah, recent changes in the irqdomain subsystem seem to have uncovered
a long standing issue where we are leaving dangling references in some
domains....
I've now dropped the branch from -next while I figure it out.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 18:43 linux-next: NVME using PCI legacy interrupts only Heiner Kallweit
2021-06-10 8:06 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0n2qh38.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox