From: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] net: fec: initialize clock with 0 rather than current kernel time
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:18:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0ze7wna.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200708144803.GB13374@hoboy> (Richard Cochran's message of "Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:48:03 -0700")
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 03:37:29PM +0300, Sergey Organov wrote:
>> Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:27:21PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> >> There's no correct answer, I'm afraid. Whatever the default value of the
>> >> clock may be, it's bound to be confusing for some reason, _if_ the
>> >> reason why you're investigating it in the first place is a driver bug.
>> >> Also, I don't really see how your change to use Jan 1st 1970 makes it
>> >> any less confusing.
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > For a PHC, the user of the clock must check the PTP stack's
>> > synchronization flags via the management interface to know the status
>> > of the time signal.
>>
>> Actually, as I just realized, the right solution for my original problem
>> would rather be adding PTP clock ID that time stamped Ethernet packet to
>> the Ethernet hardware time stamp (see my previous reply as well).
>
> I think you misunderstood my point. I wasn't commenting on the
> "stacked" MAC/PHY/DSA time stamp issue in the kernel.
I think I did. It's rather that initialization value of PHP clock has
consequences in MAC/PHY/DSA, and there is no way to check any flags
/there/. And it's exactly the place where I needed the info, see
background explanation below.
I understand what your point is, but I try to explain that it's
irrelevant for my particular use-case.
>
> I am talking about the question of whether to initialize the PHC time
> to zero (decades off from TAI) or ktime (likely about 37 seconds off
> from TAI). It does not really matter, because the user must not guess
> whether the time is valid based on the value. Instead, the user
> should query the relevant PTP data sets in a "live" online manner.
I'm implementing PTP master clock, and there are no PTP data sets (yet)
in my case, as it's me who will eventually create them.
>
> For example, to tell whether a PHC is synchronized to anything at all,
> you need to check PORT_DATA_SET.portState and probably also
> CURRENT_DATA_SET.offsetFromMaster depending on your needs.
These are fields of PTP stack software that is not running in my case.
>
> In addition, if you care about global time, you need to check:
>
> TIME_PROPERTIES_DATA_SET
> currentUtcOffset
> currentUtcOffsetValid
> ptpTimescale
> timeTraceable
> frequencyTraceable
I'm going to become PTP master clock, I already have very precise
estimations of PTP time, I know UTC offset, all this independently from
any PTP stack. Moreover, I've already synchronized PHY clock to this
time scale with +-5ns accuracy, and then I suddenly get somewhat wrong
hardware time stamps for Ethernet packets that I send/receive. You see?
Setting initial value of PTP clock to 0 would allow me to figure what
happens (time stamp coming from /different/ PTP clock) half a day
earlier. Not a big deal, I agree, yet I wanted to help a little bit
somebody who might happen to run into a similar trouble in the future.
Thanks,
-- Sergey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-06 14:26 [PATCH 0/5] net: fec: fix external PTP PHY support Sergey Organov
2020-07-06 14:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: fec: properly support external PTP PHY for hardware time stamping Sergey Organov
2020-07-06 15:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-06 15:21 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-06 15:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-06 18:33 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-07 7:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-07 15:29 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 11:00 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-08 10:55 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-06 14:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: fec: enable to use PPS feature without " Sergey Organov
2020-07-07 4:05 ` [EXT] " Andy Duan
2020-07-07 14:29 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-06 14:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] net: fec: initialize clock with 0 rather than current kernel time Sergey Organov
2020-07-06 15:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-06 18:24 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-07 6:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-07 16:07 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-07 16:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-07 17:09 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-07 17:12 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-07 17:56 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 11:15 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-08 12:14 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 11:11 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-08 11:04 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-08 12:24 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 12:37 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 14:48 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-08 17:18 ` Sergey Organov [this message]
2020-07-06 14:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] net: fec: get rid of redundant code in fec_ptp_set() Sergey Organov
2020-07-07 4:08 ` [EXT] " Andy Duan
2020-07-07 14:43 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 5:34 ` Andy Duan
2020-07-08 8:48 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-08 8:57 ` Andy Duan
2020-07-08 12:26 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-06 14:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] net: fec: replace snprintf() with strlcpy() in fec_ptp_init() Sergey Organov
2020-07-11 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 net] net: fec: fix hardware time stamping by external devices Sergey Organov
2020-07-11 23:19 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-12 14:16 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-12 14:47 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-12 15:01 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-12 17:29 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-12 19:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-12 22:32 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-12 23:15 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-14 12:39 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-14 14:23 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-14 14:35 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-14 14:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-07-14 16:18 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-14 14:01 ` Richard Cochran
2020-07-14 14:27 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-14 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 " Sergey Organov
2020-07-16 18:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-16 20:38 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-16 21:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-16 21:18 ` Sergey Organov
2020-07-15 15:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: fec: a few improvements Sergey Organov
2020-07-15 15:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: fec: enable to use PPS feature without time stamping Sergey Organov
2020-07-15 15:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: fec: initialize clock with 0 rather than current kernel time Sergey Organov
2020-07-15 15:42 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: fec: get rid of redundant code in fec_ptp_set() Sergey Organov
2020-07-15 15:43 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: fec: replace snprintf() with strlcpy() in fec_ptp_init() Sergey Organov
2020-07-16 3:00 ` [EXT] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: fec: a few improvements Andy Duan
2020-07-16 18:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0ze7wna.fsf@osv.gnss.ru \
--to=sorganov@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fugang.duan@nxp.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox