From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
oleg@redhat.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:31:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k24bsmh4.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170615184820.22994-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> (Luis R. Rodriguez's message of "Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:48:19 -0700")
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> writes:
> There are cases where folks are using an interruptible swait when
> using kthreads. This is rather confusing given you'd expect
> interruptible waits to be -- interruptible, but kthreads are not
> interruptible ! The reason for such practice though is to avoid
> having these kthreads contribute to the system load average.
>
> When systems are idle some kthreads may spend a lot of time blocking if
> using swait_event_timeout(). This would contribute to the system load
> average. On systems without preemption this would mean the load average
> of an idle system is bumped to 2 instead of 0. On systems with PREEMPT=y
> this would mean the load average of an idle system is bumped to 3
> instead of 0.
>
> This adds proper API using TASK_IDLE to make such goals explicit and
> avoid confusion.
>
> Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/swait.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h
> index 2c700694d50a..105c70e23286 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swait.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swait.h
> @@ -194,4 +194,29 @@ do { \
> __ret; \
> })
>
> +#define __swait_event_idle(wq, condition) \
> + ___swait_event(wq, condition, TASK_IDLE, 0, schedule())
> +
> +#define swait_event_idle(wq, condition) \
> +({ \
> + int __ret = 0; \
> + if (!(condition)) \
> + __ret = __swait_event_idle(wq, condition); \
> + __ret; \
> +})
The wait isn't interruptible so a return code doesn't make sense here.
> +#define __swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
> + ___swait_event(wq, ___wait_cond_timeout(condition), \
> + TASK_IDLE, timeout, \
> + __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret))
> +
> +#define swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, condition, timeout) \
> +({ \
> + long __ret = timeout; \
> + if (!___wait_cond_timeout(condition)) \
> + __ret = __swait_event_idle_timeout(wq, \
> + condition, timeout); \
> + __ret; \
> +})
> +
> #endif /* _LINUX_SWAIT_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-16 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-14 23:06 [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-14 23:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 15:50 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 16:35 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 16:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-15 18:48 ` [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 18:48 ` [RFC v2 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-16 0:47 ` Boqun Feng
2017-06-20 21:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-16 20:31 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2017-06-19 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 18:48 ` [RFC v2 2/2] rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 21:57 ` [RFC v2 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 23:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-15 23:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-16 20:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-06-19 17:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-20 21:45 ` [PATCH " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-21 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] swait: add idle to make idle-hacks on kthreads explicit Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-21 17:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-21 18:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 17:34 ` [RFC] rcu: use killable versions of swait Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k24bsmh4.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox