From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alex Ng <alexng@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] hv_util: use do_adjtimex() to update system time
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:37:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k2a9adil.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170104110953.49c41633@xeon-e3> (Stephen Hemminger's message of "Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:09:53 -0800")
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> writes:
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:24:38 +0100
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> With TimeSync version 4 protocol support we started updating system time
>> continuously through the whole lifetime of Hyper-V guests. Every 5 seconds
>> there is a time sample from the host which triggers do_settimeofday[64]().
>> While the time from the host is very accurate such adjustments may cause
>> issues:
>> - Time is jumping forward and backward, some applications may misbehave.
>> - In case an NTP client is run in parallel things may go south, e.g. when
>> an NTP client tries to adjust tick/frequency with ADJ_TICK/ADJ_FREQUENCY
>> the Hyper-V module will not see this changes and time will oscillate and
>> never converge.
>> - Systemd starts annoying you by printing "Time has been changed" every 5
>> seconds to the system log.
>>
>> Instead of calling do_settimeofday64() we can pretend being an NTP client
>> and use do_adjtimex(). Do do_settimeofday64() in case the difference is too
>> big or ICTIMESYNCFLAG_SYNC flag was set in the request.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - do do_settimeofday64() when ICTIMESYNCFLAG_SYNC flag is present in the
>> request (Alex Ng)
>> - add pr_debug() for the case when do_adjtimex() fails (Alex Ng)
>> ---
>> drivers/hv/hv_util.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_util.c b/drivers/hv/hv_util.c
>> index 94719eb..7e97231 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_util.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_util.c
>> @@ -182,9 +182,11 @@ struct adj_time_work {
>> static void hv_set_host_time(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> struct adj_time_work *wrk;
>> - s64 host_tns;
>> + s64 host_tns, our_tns, delta;
>> u64 newtime;
>> - struct timespec64 host_ts;
>> + struct timespec64 host_ts, our_ts;
>> + struct timex txc = {0};
>> + int ret;
>>
>> wrk = container_of(work, struct adj_time_work, work);
>>
>> @@ -205,7 +207,31 @@ static void hv_set_host_time(struct work_struct *work)
>> host_tns = (newtime - WLTIMEDELTA) * 100;
>> host_ts = ns_to_timespec64(host_tns);
>>
>> - do_settimeofday64(&host_ts);
>> + getnstimeofday64(&our_ts);
>> + our_tns = timespec64_to_ns(&our_ts);
>> +
>> + /* Difference between our time and host time */
>> + delta = host_tns - our_tns;
>
> This looks correct to me.
> Did you consider using ktime? It provides a cleaner abstraction for handling
> nanosecond time resolution.
I see. While s64 should work ktime seems preferable. I'll give it a try.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-05 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 17:24 [PATCH v2 0/4] hv_util: adjust system time smoothly Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] timekeeping: export do_adjtimex() to modules Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-07 1:06 ` John Stultz
2017-01-09 13:03 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] hv_util: switch to using timespec64 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-07 1:04 ` John Stultz
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] hv_util: use do_adjtimex() to update system time Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 19:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-05 12:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2017-01-07 0:56 ` John Stultz
2017-01-04 17:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] hv_util: improve time adjustment accuracy by disabling interrupts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-04 19:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-05 12:35 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-05 17:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-07 1:02 ` John Stultz
2017-01-09 13:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-09 21:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] hv_util: adjust system time smoothly Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-10 14:30 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-10 14:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-13 13:05 ` [PATCH RFC] hv_utils: implement Hyper-V PTP source Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-13 14:50 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-13 15:38 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-13 15:21 ` Olaf Hering
2017-01-13 15:37 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-01-16 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-17 9:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k2a9adil.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=alexng@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox