From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754829AbbDTUZD (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:25:03 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com ([209.85.215.44]:34818 "EHLO mail-la0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753593AbbDTUYs (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:24:48 -0400 From: Rasmus Villemoes To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: use -mskip-rax-setup when available Organization: D03 References: <1429532896-10265-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20150420150735.GA10191@pd.tnic> X-Hashcash: 1:20:150420:hpa@zytor.com::XzB9/7H7fSl/63Oc:00000AOl X-Hashcash: 1:20:150420:mingo@redhat.com::ivvHNn+J0baeKhGw:005lo X-Hashcash: 1:20:150420:tglx@linutronix.de::1KiGNlPkYJfQ39E/:00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001+Dw X-Hashcash: 1:20:150420:x86@kernel.org::ujt2Z2x9mEH3EgFz:000303H X-Hashcash: 1:20:150420:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::O/o6MwXFrNKqXNhC:0000000000000000000000000000000004Xnx X-Hashcash: 1:20:150420:bp@alien8.de::+gCNqAJFPpjh7E42:000005jPP Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:24:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150420150735.GA10191@pd.tnic> (Borislav Petkov's message of "Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:07:35 +0200") Message-ID: <87k2x64kfn.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 20 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> >> Nothing seems to have happened on the kernel side since H.J. Lu >> implemented this in December. Since gcc 5 is officially released > > I see the same patch from him from Apr. 16th: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMe9rOrfDo3MGaQc_s5crw3TrYhS8NtqeyRcUFiA0yAV8e9Nig@mail.gmail.com > > Why are you sending it too? Hadn't seen that, so I wrongly assumed everybody had forgotten about it. I don't care about the S-o-b on the trivial Makefile patch, but my request for a feature-suggested-by or similar still stands. Rasmus