public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Some kernel module options not showing up in modinfo
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 08:46:59 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3fpfsbo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131122073454.GE17630@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com>

Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I noticed that some options are not visible in the modinfo output. For
>> > instance "modinfo lockd" reports this on my Debian sid system:
> [...]
>> > Multiple other options are defined by way of module_param_call(...) like
>> > nlm_grace_period, nlm_timeout, nlm_updport, nlm_tcpport.
>> 
>> Yes, the module_param() macro adds a type description.  The
>> module_param_call() does not.
>
> Couldn't they be displayed without any type or with a type "unknown" ?
>
> parm: nlm_grace_period
>
> or 
>
> parm: nlm_grace_period:unknown

The type thing is really a hack.  Ideally we should force documentation
on everyone who declares a module parameter with a new macro we can
transition to.

Of course, most descriptions would be incoherent, a-la Kbuild help
messages, so we'd need an enforcer...

Rusty.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-01  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-21 14:47 Some kernel module options not showing up in modinfo Raphael Hertzog
2013-11-22  2:36 ` Rusty Russell
2013-11-22  7:34   ` Raphael Hertzog
2013-11-30 22:16     ` Rusty Russell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k3fpfsbo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=hertzog@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox