From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760849Ab2C3OKw (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:10:52 -0400 Received: from na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.205]:35470 "EHLO na3sys009aog111.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759385Ab2C3OKp (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:10:45 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Geoff Levand Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , LKML , linaro-sched-sig@lists.linaro.org, Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Hemminger , Daniel Lezcano , Chris Metcalf , Ingo Molnar , Gilad Ben Yossef , Alessio Igor Bogani , Avi Kivity , Max Krasnyansky , Zen Lin , Steven Rostedt , Christoph Lameter , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/32] Nohz cpusets v2 (adaptive tickless kernel) Organization: Texas Instruments, Inc. References: <1332338318-5958-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <87r4wbhqqd.fsf@ti.com> <20120330004527.GB2571@somewhere.redhat.com> <1333073233.4912.44.camel@smoke> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:10:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1333073233.4912.44.camel@smoke> (Geoff Levand's message of "Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:07:13 -0700") Message-ID: <87k422gows.fsf@ti.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geoff Levand writes: > Hi All, > > On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 02:45 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:33:46PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> > For anyone interested in collaborating on ARM support, my >> > work-in-progress branch is below[1] based on Frederic's cpuset-v2 >> > branch. Patches and testing welcome. >> > >> > [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux.git wip/arm-nohz-cpusets >> >> Nice! Thanks for working on this. You may want to work with Geoff Levand who's working >> on the ARM port too. > > You can see my work here: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geoff/nohz.git Great! Will have a closer look. A quick look suggests we've done almost exactly the same thing. Guess that's a good sign. :) > I also put a simple test I got from Frederic here: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geoff/nohz-tests.git Great, having a common test to compare results was going to be my next question. I'll start playing with these next week. Thanks. > Feel free to expand on either! > Kevin, I'll take a look at your work, I guess it has the same things as > mine. Yeah, we've done basically the same thing. I see though that you've also already handled some RCU idle cases that I hadn't. Since you're a little further than me, I'll switch you yours and start using that as the base > Will you be at the Collaboration Summit next week? Unfortunately, no. Kevin