From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754070AbYIBGhd (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 02:37:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752757AbYIBGhY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 02:37:24 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:49334 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752037AbYIBGhY (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 02:37:24 -0400 To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linus Torvalds , Larry Finger , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alok Kataria , Michael Buesch Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 From: Andi Kleen References: <48BB2116.1060904@lwfinger.net> <48BC2A03.9000104@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:37:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Tue, 2 Sep 2008 01:24:45 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: <87k5dvvysd.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner writes: > > The whole ACPI code relies pretty much on PM_TIMER and as I said The Linux ACPI code does not rely on PM_TIMER in any special ways AFAIK (except that it occasionally uses standard linux timer functions) It merely discovers it for use by the other pmtimer users. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com