From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.cipherat.com (mail.cipherat.com [91.98.42.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899632FB97B for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2026 23:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.98.42.103 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777245147; cv=none; b=ndmr5pl+ezkXiriSQ59qwVO7eODp33CrpB+SqXdAXOIR9kuOEUkHkJC1gdaerIQE4mApSXIV83WBWyenBP6lhuTRVcuqg1WO/F+2Ml07+jP+TWMHUELZgO1VNk900jzvEf9IJzgrfV0UvJ1Wjn1JojZ07HkCXpUokVVb6Kp7OvA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777245147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vJyx4/r55UctGelMiEYqcTy9x/hNwse77hjwKq/rJcQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=RrSgOln5nSIDCBh9smTkflEzl/ZzH+0FqI8+4IqJnf8qpYy0YM9w/chbethX9/Zkm6QScn6BMgQS6NsAswr029dVWFm4gn1SoNB9604asz6kkQLFBfvWUYa5LlC6T8m5YlGjx3iznBVSucLs6rM1c1l06LqwmntgtrlYBNb36CM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cipherat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cipherat.com; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=cipherat.com header.i=@cipherat.com header.b=kDLRl1cz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.98.42.103 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cipherat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cipherat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=cipherat.com header.i=@cipherat.com header.b="kDLRl1cz" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id E592984E88; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 02:12:23 +0300 (+03) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cipherat.com; s=dkim; t=1777245144; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to; bh=FYtL1aFYRY7ENepbxLKzH9p42WNA2KTd/3JCyjCv8AM=; b=kDLRl1czHeXS92iHVGnkOP+8slP2WqIqf7SWGY1sBExmUiPQBKqbyWP4Xe9lPO9Bg9iDmk d9Dil7t+Rn5wY/WuBlWZaeWb1yusCBF7jE91JyfSYgY5ExrDxSpSfbeCxMytYd+6BZ2vzP eYcbsUoqQzlXEqj6xFu8/W4Y588Hjx/gDyxI4Oy5ZrZhZ6LKd3qDgnh8/R2suuSxi0UaIz YgRJCy0JA0nqW+OspO33HPDdgNet8WaeDiwelIBEP8HIt5CixvJPIfLSWpVAg1+69JNPVi 2R+PXXdscUOQKS1xew8zj6sibdMPTmQqabzG6wwF359W4zC0HCFuWs2oRtrEiUA7zMcgbp lpuS19XQniQ3/KBcgQOjhfwbVNwxDIwh14M4+jvJQF9jirHMT4jRfWhoTg4uZKhiMGKi64 c7UiAjYUoCXoWhqoxwNhkgLMlGZ5CYEOeRTXimBpDOWhhz+nQk8q3pEnRmiqLp3iEfE9+j diw/+sUiu9LJM+vg0gWGoc52QzLCmXXGKtCFZ4k6bN5VBthHHLpKDEQ4UyXNoxfcbvMTD/ cGctGOMoraxeEZyWnu4AVVLHTcgcPRsUnZTF1kI3o15CcY/0VAT1cOjgcxnvFzQ/N3nHcv 9jxzaPpKR5Uj13dA9vtyYhSPW4p0cKFspXOyHUVTseVAeGD4ClNz8= From: Salman Alghamdi To: luka.gejak@linux.dev Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, straube.linux@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: fix long lines and related issues In-Reply-To: <20260426225552.87114-1-me@cipherat.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.14.0; emacs 30.2 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 02:12:22 +0300 Message-ID: <87lde9pb8p.fsf@cipherat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 I noticed the function signature continuation lines appear misaligned in the mailing list archive. I've verified the alignment in the file using cat -A which shows correct tabs+spaces: ^I^I^I^I^I struct wlan_network *network) The misalignment appears to be a rendering artifact in the email client or archive. If you can verify by applying the patch locally I'd appreciate confirmation, or if there's a known fix I'm happy to address it. Regards, Salman Alghamdi.