From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from phubs.tethera.net (phubs.tethera.net [192.99.9.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476DA339A8; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 13:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.99.9.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758633254; cv=none; b=BF1v0FgK/D8PLcZQoWJEDdnnjdUWhKZcd8pOueXXZlHLaM5BkA1vqb95x9latjUoUAaTKA9Jf2J3DoEP0wpuwOw9PR8l7zXsm8/ZRqaWhbp+ftJYOjUP97p+sjE/tm95jLzg9tUuuflED9gh439KCixW6hjT3YCpssQsg7bM0+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758633254; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2sItBj+QU9qdXvNcIECQjyDp7nGnsVveQgohkd3EYmM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=vCIVLPPGh+mDY15CZB9dZLwxnMytX9hgGsbzTnHtPGvz21vYNb7FAN6X8RzXRCxnGMgbzG/INDZyfZLsir3zMQUi7qnLRTH3WQiEhKZggnXmB4ZU5253jrF3GUDhJ9MMeB3UfR1+TGSoCQWI6dcz1TTfB2lzhmrait6vQ4foe7Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tethera.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tethera.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tethera.net header.i=@tethera.net header.b=fhY2a8K3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.99.9.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tethera.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tethera.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tethera.net header.i=@tethera.net header.b="fhY2a8K3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tethera.net; i=@tethera.net; q=dns/txt; s=2024; t=1758632774; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=2sItBj+QU9qdXvNcIECQjyDp7nGnsVveQgohkd3EYmM=; b=fhY2a8K3+6Pqc7obdcyMoOLs2tg8wCZkGhoAXWA9670cPb67vtaRWP6JtAARfUpFAZs84 IBx29vHM9Jx0C1WoHSU3HOMtKhfHw5OnrBD+qJSNuOiojlAoGPpdI0n1yFXcRmoPpqvBWqB LSjVz2iXNeb1Rls66wn8GHXud1K2QVXMf8Y4NfvWZTcPd9lLXJU0CS5b6+ufgxB7chZsJF+ 6SjHwRsZcTCiego5lqemkQ0b9qFxDqd0YGom6xqLJf6fADTwDxQ3SGawi7Cgsn5CMrpaTPN 0ljaoj5ya23LZ0i0WKjwBoVlytOr/Jv7PCE/+FUWnn2ho0ZGTF7eooo5zMjA== Received: from tethera.net (fctnnbsc51w-159-2-211-58.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net [159.2.211.58]) by phubs.tethera.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C93D818006D; Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:06:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: (nullmailer pid 1548093 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 23 Sep 2025 13:06:13 -0000 From: David Bremner To: devnull+manivannan.sadhasivam.oss.qualcomm.com@kernel.org Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, cassel@kernel.org, heiko@sntech.de, krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com, kwilczynski@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, lpieralisi@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de, mahesh@linux.ibm.com, mani@kernel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com, oohall@gmail.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] PCI: Add support for resetting the Root Ports in a platform specific way In-Reply-To: <20250715-pci-port-reset-v6-0-6f9cce94e7bb@oss.qualcomm.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:06:13 -0300 Message-ID: <87ldm548u2.fsf@tethera.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain I have been testing this series on the 6.17 pre-releases, lightly patched by the collabora [1] and mnt-reform [2] teams. I have been testing on bare hardware, on MNT Research's pocket-reform product. I'm afraid I can only offer CI level feedback, but in case it helps 1) The series now applies cleanly onto collabora's rockchip-devel branch 2) The resulting kernel boots and runs OK. 3) the resulting kernel still fails the "platform" pm_test [3] with "rockchip-dw-pcie a40c00000.pcie: Phy link never came up" Of course there could be other reasons for (3), I don't know that much about it. I'm happy to test a newer version of the series if/when it exists. d [1]: https://gitlab.collabora.com/hardware-enablement/rockchip-3588/linux.git#rockchip-devel [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/bremner/collabora-rockchip-3588#reform-patches [3]: https://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner/blog/posts/hibernate-pocket-12/