From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF60539A for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744653782; cv=none; b=p9DTwFfadphKId1ceWxiPeQ1S1k24AVW/U8x1XmcTkdzGWnFU+2S09L02TEaqqOxOwVc3RAVxpFi7WEU/WZhmdLnVdypVwGr2u3ISaUtewV5sZaxJytqSHXM343/IL8b/mGVPROC15M971kq/dkI7c93ktKUH7a7gob/IJfryPk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744653782; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KZLZm38fvN7eoFZ7AVti9iLhoYnoSNpOttdP4s28SGE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YkVTaoR1mk8Po7uB0YLHxDtVxLY4ay+Mx4m2JAwFpHHNVjJCuXZR2PT8+soBo9+IuCR4GiFo+UGBBjylLDUohlcsXWtb5N5FPSqVm7QZ66Jmi82XOC2L6vI7Gego0VziD5tGyJ9cRpCrABrwRfFl8/NcxRWvERQv8hB+dpVLLaM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=kX5sbQsn; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=AwUh6FRP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="kX5sbQsn"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="AwUh6FRP" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1744653778; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EQqudjAlTHduY4Y4lsejGgZN+jnS3ffTjfYPiImdjK8=; b=kX5sbQsnGqQjYwhXNWSaLaFrUx5lZfl9GcoHnVRMgqVUSMQpbRXOPX8x1IIfdchV95ALuJ LduhJaRM3OoPSPg0/7Tu/j4ILsU5KJK0r8/pAhjTxy3EX3gR6YGNfsymJjlS+RSBrrsQYF iXbqhWtWUwF4WnWLJMj5qSwjrGtVL5lT3dPEby39dEheF4TayP+f7E7kMHPqsJie4iqiVw J/qtsCRtqxaenTTE6E41KoddeLKxHo185d84hfn97AGno2zoh7p2bETwMqvmES8cmXpAWO Hm1+UgV+psWPqL+ZNNYZyehQBsBX+mPRkVWSpGW+ww6l1Y/cygmhYXNd8UqMQA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1744653778; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EQqudjAlTHduY4Y4lsejGgZN+jnS3ffTjfYPiImdjK8=; b=AwUh6FRPoc+Kd0Doc70kww1SEms7JIeE2waKcZVJKL7vhimI6GRs9TwdXT6cMxNyUce7QO KRFMr1MrY1WsobDQ== To: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , "H . Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Anil Gurumurthy , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Sudarsana Kalluru Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] scsi: bfa: Rename 'timer_mod' to 'timer_module' In-Reply-To: <20250414102301.332225-3-mingo@kernel.org> References: <20250414102301.332225-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20250414102301.332225-3-mingo@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:02:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87lds2sjse.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Apr 14 2025 at 12:22, Ingo Molnar wrote: > We'd like to introduce timer_mod() in the kernel, so make > sure the namespace is clear. Interesting. > arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-s3c/s3c64xx.c | 4 +-- > arch/arm/mach-s3c/s3c64xx.h | 6 ++--- > arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 4 +-- > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 18 ++++++------- > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 4 +-- > drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-32k.c | 4 +-- > drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c | 6 ++--- > drivers/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3120.c | 20 +++++++------- > drivers/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3501.c | 2 +- > drivers/counter/rz-mtu3-cnt.c | 16 +++++------ > drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c | 20 +++++++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 4 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c | 4 +-- > drivers/leds/leds-netxbig.c | 4 +-- > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa.h | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_core.c | 4 +-- > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c | 20 +++++++------- > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.h | 10 +++---- > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_modules.h | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c | 2 +- > fs/timerfd.c | 2 +- > include/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.h | 2 +- > include/linux/hrtimer.h | 24 ++++++++--------- > include/linux/torture.h | 2 +- > include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 16 +++++------ > include/trace/events/timer.h | 14 +++++----- > io_uring/rw.c | 2 +- > io_uring/timeout.c | 8 +++--- > io_uring/timeout.h | 2 +- > kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 2 +- > kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 34 ++++++++++++------------ > kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 2 +- > kernel/time/sleep_timeout.c | 6 ++--- > kernel/torture.c | 2 +- > net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 4 +-- > net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 2 +- > net/rxrpc/input.c | 4 +-- > net/rxrpc/input_rack.c | 10 +++---- > net/rxrpc/output.c | 2 +- > rust/kernel/time/hrtimer.rs | 32 +++++++++++----------- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_vmlinux.c | 4 +-- > 42 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-) All of that is related to 'scsi: bfa:', right? > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c > index 6a5815aa05e6..ce9295ca2960 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void omap1_pm_idle(void) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER > - use_idlect1 = omap_dm_timer_modify_idlect_mask(use_idlect1); > + use_idlect1 = omap_dm_timer_moduleify_idlect_mask(use_idlect1); I have no idea how this is related to the subject or the change log of this patch. > #endif > > if (omap_dma_running()) > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c/s3c64xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c/s3c64xx.c > index 6c70ea7f2931..6c1d020b181e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c/s3c64xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c/s3c64xx.c > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static struct samsung_pwm_variant s3c64xx_pwm_variant = { > .tclk_mask = (1 << 7) | (1 << 6) | (1 << 5), > }; > > -void __init s3c64xx_set_timer_source(enum s3c64xx_timer_mode event, > - enum s3c64xx_timer_mode source) > +void __init s3c64xx_set_timer_source(enum s3c64xx_timer_modulee event, > + enum s3c64xx_timer_modulee source) > -enum s3c64xx_timer_mode { > +enum s3c64xx_timer_modulee { > - apic->lapic_timer.timer_mode_mask = 3 << 17; > + apic->lapic_timer.timer_modulee_mask = 3 << 17; > - u32 timer_mode; > - u32 timer_mode_mask; > + u32 timer_modulee; > + u32 timer_modulee_mask; > - struct bfa_timer_mod_s *timer_mod; > + struct bfa_timer_module_s *timer_module; > -static void __init ti_32k_timer_module_init(struct device_node *np, > +static void __init ti_32k_timer_moduleule_init(struct device_node *np, Seriously? Has AI gone wild or what? There is not a single instance of change in this pile, which actually makes sense. This thing definitely qualifies for the 'garbage of the year' award and already leads the decade rankings by far. Thanks, tglx