From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A0B1632FB; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729861959; cv=none; b=UpVKz9dfR/EWZoDqI9YbtGO4NsWbL07TcGnmf0j+FUgo4l4slpN1SFd1PASPwo0EENivviPnfUcHncke2vxUlnSObJp4r3nO2ehvJk5pk4QerHVQ4J//nZxusvM5LohI0i0RMSC8fihQ92L3jqHZDyYbPmIwwpl6LADL6YWHFvg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729861959; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wPrPDjvbuQeiP58khSTGY/QVQn6BJGp/uT7g+qbLK7I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r4vxun2J47+byJyJnuYszRX0uC/tSU8qpxed0uL4jtbZUq74IwF38K3Y0WFzfQP/vYTYZnVs0I3JWRRpldekP2VghOHJDn7Ws0lTsFE0zrwJoxZZbrxFajnRuhxfk4y0lQCqN4Y3RleaBh72+PwiJYbLIkUjwzL1VkxW7vHB6qI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=ebJMppbs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="ebJMppbs" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net A296B42B33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1729861948; bh=BrHRkZL2jwggyue0IzkvCSWmi2sXcluKyZactR+0LE8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ebJMppbsW6ZgH4vAHtkwWdAILVSIHNfBY5Js/CLvA0fFihlvRYzkIvrEd+RzzXwU/ pH4HhKCjny5z4mn7l4ekPKKOvQWXFeyC76jGVBR6r69Tq3kSzP69pDct2PSjbA6iLu gG9WQEzPglyq4ogCH94sszx0ZA579Hlz0tN2/cE5kIGshzcOd9c86YabZVrT9nQTJt JS/Fy4tRUypp82kfNI2fQs97Ki8Eh3kToex/EK8N/2vzj6I0JDErE1Mj6FWsH2LDbx vnEuRsn4MTpRbqqEJA4d7JrREGGUrE5kQjmv8FKVW+HGKD+mGBmNbhI5TWSHEmnDrH DrIDFEtGaQUzQ== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A296B42B33; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:12:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, alexs@kernel.org, si.yanteng@linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mudongliangabcd@gmail.com, seakeel@gmail.com Cc: wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, fan.yu9@zte.com.cn, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, he.peilin@zte.com.cn, tu.qiang35@zte.com.cn, qiu.yutan@zte.com.cn, zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v8] Docs/zh_CN: Translate physical_memory.rst to Simplified Chinese In-Reply-To: <20241025150959063tInm4F6ZTyqASNRxU2GIJ@zte.com.cn> References: <20241025150959063tInm4F6ZTyqASNRxU2GIJ@zte.com.cn> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 07:12:27 -0600 Message-ID: <87ldyc1g3o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain writes: > From: Yaxin Wang > > This patch translates the "physical_memory.rst" document into > Simplified Chinese to improve accessibility for Chinese-speaking > developers and users. > > The translation was done with attention to technical accuracy > and readability, ensuring that the document remains informative > and useful in its translated form. > > Update to commit 7332f9e45d2e("docs/mm: Physical Memory: Fix grammar") > > Signed-off-by: Yaxin Wang > Signed-off-by: Jiang Kun > Reviewed-by: xu xin One does not normally put a Reviewed-by tag on one's own patches, so now I am confused. What is the role of you and Jiang Kung in the presentation of this patch? Thanks, jon