From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <bard.liao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: iosf_mbi_available
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:59:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87le1zvzw9.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d121ec31-0861-4324-8f53-6e06eaf60233@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:23:40 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/18/24 09:26, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:28:06 +0200,
> > Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 01:43:35PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7/16/24 01:07, kernel test robot wrote:
> >>>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> >>>> head: 3e7819886281e077e82006fe4804b0d6b0f5643b
> >>>> commit: 8d4ba1be3d2257606e04aff412829d8972670750 ASoC: SOF: pci: split PCI into different drivers
> >>>> date: 3 years, 4 months ago
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't seem to be a problem on the latest code? was it intentional
> >>> to report a problem on such an old commit?
> >>
> >> It's still reproducible at commit 8b0f0bb27c32 ("Merge tag
> >> 'fs_for_v6.11-rc1' of
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs") for me,
> >> using either LLVM or GCC with the configuration linked below:
>
> I can't compile this branch - errors in unrelated parts of the code, but
> indeed there's a problem when IOSF_MBI=y and Baytrail is not selected.
>
> >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: iosf_mbi_available
> >> >>> referenced by atom.c
> >> >>> sound/soc/sof/intel/atom.o:(atom_machine_select) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>
> >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: iosf_mbi_read
> >> >>> referenced by atom.c
> >> >>> sound/soc/sof/intel/atom.o:(atom_machine_select) in archive vmlinux.a
> >>
> >> .../gcc/14.1.0/bin/i386-linux-ld: sound/soc/sof/intel/atom.o: in function `atom_machine_select':
> >> atom.c:(.text+0x1b9): undefined reference to `iosf_mbi_available'
> >> .../gcc/14.1.0/bin/i386-linux-ld: atom.c:(.text+0x1e3): undefined reference to `iosf_mbi_read'
> >
> > Yours looks different from the original report, and indeed this must
> > be a missing fix.
> >
> > Does the following change cover it?
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> > --- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/Kconfig
> > +++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/Kconfig
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_ATOM_HIFI_EP
> > tristate
> > select SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_COMMON
> > select SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_HIFI_EP_IPC
> > + select IOSF_MBI if X86 && PCI
> > help
> > This option is not user-selectable but automagically handled by
> > 'select' statements at a higher level.
> > @@ -44,7 +45,6 @@ config SND_SOC_SOF_BAYTRAIL
> > select SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_COMMON
> > select SND_SOC_SOF_INTEL_ATOM_HIFI_EP
> > select SND_SOC_SOF_ACPI_DEV
> > - select IOSF_MBI if X86 && PCI
> > help
> > This adds support for Sound Open Firmware for Intel(R) platforms
> > using the Baytrail, Braswell or Cherrytrail processors.
>
> I don't think it's the 'right' fix Takashi.
>
> The problem is that we end-up using the iosf_mbi_read() routine by
> including the soc-intel-quirks.h header file blindly for all X66
> platforms - even when Baytrail is not used.
>
> Adding IOSF support for Tangiger doesn't seem right to me, it's not a
> real dependency.
>
> We can be more restrictive and only use the helper for Baytrail, and use
> a fallback if Baytrail is not used.
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-intel-quirks.h
> b/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-intel-quirks.h
> index de4e550c5b34..ae67853f7e2e 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-intel-quirks.h
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/common/soc-intel-quirks.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@
>
> #include <linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h>
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) && \
> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_BAYTRAIL) || \
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI))
>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
> #include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
>
> also at https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/5114
I'm afraid it's not enough, either. It's included in
sound/soc/sof/intel/atom.c, and this one can be built-in by selected
from others while CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_BAYTRAIL=m. And, the reverse
selection is done from CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_BAYTRAIL -- so
CONFIG_IOSF_MBI can be m as well, and this can lead to the unresolved
symbol from the built-in atom.c.
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 23:07 ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: iosf_mbi_available kernel test robot
2024-07-17 11:43 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-07-17 20:28 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-07-18 7:26 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-18 8:23 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-07-18 8:59 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2024-07-18 9:12 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-07-18 15:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-18 15:16 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-07-18 15:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2024-07-19 6:42 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87le1zvzw9.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox