From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5C418C334; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721049775; cv=none; b=hVJxlmAKmVMhIZfpNsUJOnnpIfWe1p840jzsrSb9VW7ZXZ9cUQ1U1vTImxBnSyZUElmkQljDjRTBXHax64zhOcPtk/kxpfcagcod07ltrDWnbV+CzsO8GJdkh2dKe5GK9FkcreZ+Ckp4LSQbrG4isR5zkRz9xTBdQPHfG6UKWk0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721049775; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gux/xEKHwBZQIgIxhtPr7SergtKmhzD2vfNEz/5zzrE=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rM8VegwM4PAAzyI8CD05g7h6alG6doetVNWrsedDzpF0E0rVjr4Ez57GfypW5Z0hfuOicIfS4HwMDpoor3YexMhgYF54H1uNNWkqXWQE0HcIjx9D09OanrzWdMtNSnoEiaKB9QmC/faFqydlTq3lubwNDgZLR5OBg7dmEt5caTg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b=0qhpSI+P; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b=6EW8QDW1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b=zUk81cQG; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b=Hbw/C4RB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="0qhpSI+P"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="6EW8QDW1"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="zUk81cQG"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="Hbw/C4RB" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E2F1F82A; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:22:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1721049772; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7aC04bHkKwpK3ilmAvoletI8Ju318NGY+hsR+rUvzvI=; b=0qhpSI+PovE70LGPUCUWT3KMW34+kRjOdphacczp6VjszvaQuL2FsowC0OotxqM8XRBRhI dXj9sOpDoeCd5NkWbqsRyvAJ2b234dLzCVaf3VRppB+RDU+CkLSZLoBHEMTD0njUIYwGR5 i3PdV2IRjS231aqOA1xCo1Z7DmNR4o0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1721049772; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7aC04bHkKwpK3ilmAvoletI8Ju318NGY+hsR+rUvzvI=; b=6EW8QDW1FJ2aWqR7vrg1DVCKK7fIsG4Ki11SZJOQAgZwitZc0IRgp182BhjrNcRwI5o01v lxS2+plsIqZQYBDQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1721049771; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7aC04bHkKwpK3ilmAvoletI8Ju318NGY+hsR+rUvzvI=; b=zUk81cQG31Q5bY6VDO0F3t2xXTzHy3cJlL+GqLFwhDVZTxWYmM6q63NSk+TH4ftHNHKgBZ M3Luu/Lk5d9RDF2Q6BS360iGnZxLBBjIagYbOly9wLXWtXGDUczr+MKVppHg0zE/sqAHmR 7U0G6NtIWoQS7YRNVX26iCJzl4WzDx8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1721049771; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7aC04bHkKwpK3ilmAvoletI8Ju318NGY+hsR+rUvzvI=; b=Hbw/C4RB0mBcwkvQpHEPO4kTAJUcRYkxpm0FLEpJqL/m5sdzC+zywVc2OpxIO1BdT48WKe bCyS4sQseCCGOJAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE3B134AB; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GubkCasilWZcVAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:22:51 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:23:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87le2223hv.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: Mark Brown Cc: Takashi Iwai , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Shuah Khan , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/alsa: Use card name rather than number in test names In-Reply-To: <652d6fef-9e63-4c3c-b61b-8a47d6eadaf1@sirena.org.uk> References: <20240711-alsa-kselftest-board-name-v1-1-ab5cf2dbbea6@kernel.org> <7cd921b3-fed9-4b0c-9ba8-381e45ef4218@perex.cz> <877cdrt3zc.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <31e73e81-e60f-4d0b-b0ac-118f1dc72610@sirena.org.uk> <87plrhssa4.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <652d6fef-9e63-4c3c-b61b-8a47d6eadaf1@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.30 X-Spam-Level: On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:18:44 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 08:46:43AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > OTOH, if the former is the problem, using longname won't help, > > either, rather it can be confusing. I noticed that the test output > > truncates the name string, hence both cards look identical in the > > actual output (except for the card listing at the beginning). > > Interesting - I was mainly developing on a system with multiple HDA > cards and was getting fairly clearly unique names. An AMD system usually has two HD-audio entries, and both are "HD-audio Generic". Takashi