public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Rafael J Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:04:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lf99x6nn.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210422192442.706906-4-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

Kuppuswamy!

On Thu, Apr 22 2021 at 12:24, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> +static int acpi_wakeup_cpu(int apicid, unsigned long start_ip)
> +{
> +	acpi_mp_wake_mailbox_init();
> +
> +	if (!acpi_mp_wake_mailbox)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->apic_id, apicid);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->wakeup_vector, start_ip);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command, ACPI_MP_WAKE_COMMAND_WAKEUP);

What's the point of using WRITE_ONCE() here? Where is the required
READ_ONCE() counterpart and the required documentation in form of a
comment?

> +static int __init acpi_parse_mp_wake(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> +				      const unsigned long end)
> +{
...
> +	acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update(acpi_wakeup_cpu);
...

> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_32.c
> @@ -207,3 +207,11 @@ int __init default_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +void __init acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update(wakeup_cpu_handler handler)
> +{
> +	struct apic **drv;
> +
> +	for (drv = __apicdrivers; drv < __apicdrivers_end; drv++)
> +		(*drv)->wakeup_secondary_cpu = handler;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
> index c46720f185c0..986dbb68d3c4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_64.c
> @@ -50,3 +50,11 @@ int __init default_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +void __init acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update(wakeup_cpu_handler handler)
> +{
> +	struct apic **drv;
> +
> +	for (drv = __apicdrivers; drv < __apicdrivers_end; drv++)
> +		(*drv)->wakeup_secondary_cpu = handler;
> +}

What's the reason for having two verbatim copies of the same function
which has no dependency on CONFIG_*_32/64 at all?

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-22 19:24 [PATCH 0/3] Add multiprocessor wake-up support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-22 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: ACPI 6.4: MADT: add Multiprocessor Wakeup Mailbox Structure Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-22 19:37   ` Dave Hansen
2021-04-22 19:46     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-22 19:55       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-04-22 20:51         ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-04-22 21:40           ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-22 19:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI/table: Print MADT Wake table information Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-22 19:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2021-04-22 23:04   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-04-22 23:39     ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lf99x6nn.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=erik.kaneda@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox