From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
hpa@zytor.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write in emulator
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 01:00:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfnpz4k2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324151859.31068-5-xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
>
> +bool split_lock_detect_on(void)
> +{
> + return sld_state != sld_off;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(split_lock_detect_on);
1) You export this function here
2) You change that in one of the next patches to something else
3) According to patch 1/8 X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT is not set when
sld_state == sld_off. FYI, I did that on purpose.
AFAICT #1 and #2 are just historical leftovers of your previous patch
series and the extra step was just adding more changed lines per patch
for no value.
#3 changed the detection mechanism and at the same time the semantics of
the feature flag.
So what's the point of this exercise?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 15:18 [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow " Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write in emulator Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 0:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-25 0:31 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 0:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] kvm: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 0:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 1:11 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25 1:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 1:38 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 11:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 12:31 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 6:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 12:43 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 14:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 15:09 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 18:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of " Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfnpz4k2.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox