From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx48cWzvSdNfsTyNp2VDqm9Fx4Ri9HYEno1QpTACXownUGXLGDRv8sQwfalsnBkr/0jSQI/oU ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1523449582; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=U+qhCnTLsX4O51iSKVx7l9RtgEOjtJupRW9D33zlRKIn3Nmm2/SZlJBAX9ZWBJFKl9 tXpX7pKzdibdYMokig9v3L78LSeU35fkS8V+V4GTLOZhSyVzOMji1lHPaE3fYRgvEPEA V5FhqU65UfTdL+ab7c7wBYO21loG/AtJOCy2u4jK/5f822Th1orES3ZDCUKZaSjxpsBD rxIENda2oaDNL20gAr94wMPgbHKJRPOrGJLySSknEkpkGTOmQnbeA2BfpgIUTZ169eFp LP6G472ThqlmL58rmeLPuzJSAUBgc2btDCYUIg0eE15HNVKHfMIEOo7V/UvKdGBSkgDM D3tg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:organization:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=Hu/R64pKWKRI1Y30/sF2MO0Mjt4FzxPFkIHiiLdls40=; b=erFQ09pHYCBuGqZJScBq+8rOgvDLhzMARCExTMf6sLMXEJ/9sQPUm8XUekOVebR76O NcWMuQcA2Zqrbu+vo4i8KORu+x7E9s3GP/B4BxmAegp21RTmgu97EF0+HC0q4f8EsrUS igB0jwfZRoaPu/DdtIojyab/ooaPcUd+PeyTaBiQPBQGcmdJ15BLnuKe9/IxFT8u4bcC ezIG56xzJegfyjuJITGy2waniMhptV/GiOx/rp+bLIOGABmWh9ztwFmtyEC/1jQYT/up qv1mWJF7D/AZjSlkSURLdZzPJdqq6oUDa2v2bzUt03IM4eZmjo4PrhTsWeQR1HRILzIf awjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jani.nikula@intel.com designates 192.55.52.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jani.nikula@intel.com Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jani.nikula@intel.com designates 192.55.52.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jani.nikula@intel.com X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,436,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="46046983" From: Jani Nikula To: Ian W MORRISON Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, anusha.srivatsa@intel.com, michal.wajdeczko@intel.com, Greg KH , airlied@linux.ie, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] drm/i915/glk: Add MODULE_FIRMWARE for Geminilake In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20180411044213.383-1-ianwmorrison@gmail.com> <871sfmhz88.fsf@intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 15:27:06 +0300 Message-ID: <87lgdugc85.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1597423482826443546?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1597452668604006694?= X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Ian W MORRISON wrote: > > >> >> NAK on indiscriminate Cc: stable. There are zero guarantees that older >> kernels will work with whatever firmware you throw at them. >> > > I included 'Cc: stable' so the patch would get added to the v4.16 and > v4.15 kernels which I have tested with the patch. I found that earlier > kernels didn't support the 'linux-firmware' package required to get > wifi working on Intel's new Gemini Lake NUC. You realize that this patch should have nothing to do with wifi? Rodrigo, Anusha, if you think Cc: stable is appropriate, please indicate the specific versions of stable it is appropriate for. BR, Jani. > >> >> PS. How is this a "RESEND"? I haven't seen this before. >> > > It is a 'RESEND' for that very reason. I initially sent the patch to > the same people as > a similar patch (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10143637/) however > after realising > this omitted required addresses I added them and resent the patch. > > Best regards, > Ian -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center