From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout correctly
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:34:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lhmimiac.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417687974-18681-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> We've lost the +1 required for correct timeouts in
>
> commit 5ed0bdf21a85d78e04f89f15ccf227562177cbd9
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date: Wed Jul 16 21:05:06 2014 +0000
>
> drm: i915: Use nsec based interfaces
>
> Use ktime_get_raw_ns() and get rid of the back and forth timespec
> conversions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>
> So fix this up by reinstating our handrolled _timeout function. While
> at it bother with handling MAX_JIFFIES.
>
> v2: Convert to usecs (we don't care about the accuracy anyway) first
> to avoid overflow issues Dave Gordon spotted.
>
> v3: Drop the explicit MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET check, usecs_to_jiffies should
> take care of that already. It might be a bit too enthusiastic about it
> though.
>
> v4: Chris has a much nicer color, so use his implementation.
>
> This requires to export nsec_to_jiffies from time.c.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82749
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Pushed to drm-intel-next-fixes, thanks for the patch.
BR,
Jani.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 3 ++-
> kernel/time/time.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 049482f5d9ac..564a45f4a0ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3097,6 +3097,11 @@ static inline unsigned long msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const unsigned int m)
> return min_t(unsigned long, MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET, j + 1);
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout(const u64 n)
> +{
> + return min_t(u64, MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET, nsecs_to_jiffies64(n) + 1);
> +}
> +
> static inline unsigned long
> timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(const struct timespec *value)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 9d362d320d82..04a9f26407ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1226,7 +1226,8 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true))
> return 0;
>
> - timeout_expire = timeout ? jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies((u64)*timeout) : 0;
> + timeout_expire = timeout ?
> + jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout((u64)*timeout) : 0;
>
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && ring->id == RCS && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
> gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
> diff --git a/kernel/time/time.c b/kernel/time/time.c
> index a9ae20fb0b11..8fae82ca5cbf 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/time.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/time.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ u64 nsecs_to_jiffies64(u64 n)
> return div_u64(n * 9, (9ull * NSEC_PER_SEC + HZ / 2) / HZ);
> #endif
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nsecs_to_jiffies64);
>
> /**
> * nsecs_to_jiffies - Convert nsecs in u64 to jiffies
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1417166995-10803-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-12-02 15:22 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: compute wait_ioctl timeout correctly Daniel Vetter
2014-12-02 15:36 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-02 16:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2014-12-02 16:54 ` John Stultz
2014-12-03 9:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-03 10:28 ` Imre Deak
2014-12-03 14:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-03 19:07 ` John Stultz
2014-12-04 10:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 17:42 ` John Stultz
2014-12-04 17:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 18:16 ` John Stultz
2014-12-04 18:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 20:35 ` John Stultz
2014-12-05 9:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 10:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-04 17:45 ` John Stultz
2014-12-08 12:34 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lhmimiac.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox