From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752711AbaE0BIb (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 21:08:31 -0400 Received: from lgeamrelo01.lge.com ([156.147.1.125]:43960 "EHLO lgeamrelo01.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752150AbaE0BI2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 21:08:28 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.220.181 X-Original-MAILFROM: namhyung@gmail.com From: Namhyung Kim To: Jiri Olsa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Jean Pihet , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] perf tests: Spawn child for each test References: <1400174615-2121-1-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> <1400174615-2121-11-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 10:08:25 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1400174615-2121-11-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 19:23:31 +0200") Message-ID: <87lhtohvue.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 15 May 2014 19:23:31 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > In upcoming tests we will setup process limits, which > might affect other tests. Spawning child for each test > to prevent this. But you can restore original limits after the test using soft limits? But I think it's better to run the tests in a child anyway. :) Thanks, Namhyung