From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Separate lbfd check out of NO_DEMANGLE condition
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:38:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87li2cm5je.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131002081757.GA3496@krava.brq.redhat.com> (Jiri Olsa's message of "Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:17:57 +0200")
Hi Jiri,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:17:57 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:18:32AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> It seems that it needs libdl for loading plugins. Adding -ldl makes
>> above build successfully. So we need to add -ldl for EXTLIBS IMHO.
>> Without it, make NO_GTK2=1 NO_LIBPERL=1 NO_LIBPYTHON=1 will fail to
>> check libbfd correctly (FYI, libperl and libpython add -ldl to the
>> dependency list).
>
> hum, so on my system -liberty check wins without -lbfd,
> so 'NO_GTK2=1 NO_LIBPERL=1 NO_LIBPYTHON=1' passes
>
> I need to check Ingo's latest changes on this, not sure how
> if this problem is relevant any longer ;-)
AFAICS, Ingo's patch does "-lbfd -ldl" rather than "-lbfd". So probably
there's no problem then. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 18:55 [PATCH] perf tools: Add missing -ldl for gtk build Jiri Olsa
2013-09-27 2:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-27 14:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Separate lbfd check out of NO_DEMANGLE condition Jiri Olsa
2013-09-27 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Adding missing ifdef for cmd_trace call Jiri Olsa
2013-09-27 14:32 ` [BUG/RFC 3/3] perf tools: Add missing GTK2_SUPPORT ifdefs Jiri Olsa
2013-09-27 18:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-09-29 6:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-09-29 6:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Separate lbfd check out of NO_DEMANGLE condition Namhyung Kim
2013-09-30 3:13 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-02 1:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-10-02 8:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-10-02 8:38 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-10-02 10:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-15 5:28 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Add missing -ldl for gtk build tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87li2cm5je.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox