From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
wim@iguana.be, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
vgoyal@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com, linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add hook for kicking in kdump path
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:49:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87li8gaku0.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366233596-34681-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> (Don Zickus's message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:19:56 -0400")
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> writes:
> A common problem with kdump is that during the boot up of the
> second kernel, the hardware watchdog times out and reboots the
> machine before a vmcore can be captured.
>
> Instead of tellling customers to disable their hardware watchdog
> timers, I hacked up a hook to put in the kdump path that provides
> one last kick before jumping into the second kernel.
>
> The assumption is the watchdog timeout is at least 10-30 seconds
> long, enough to get the second kernel to userspace to kick the watchdog
> again, if needed.
Why not double the watchdog timeout? and/or pet the watchdog a little
more frequently.
This is the least icky hook I have seen proposed to be put on the kexec
on panic path, but I still suspect this may reduce the ability to take a
crash dump. What happens if it was the watchdog timer that panic'd for
example.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 21:19 [PATCH v3] watchdog: Add hook for kicking in kdump path Don Zickus
2013-04-17 21:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-17 21:49 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2013-04-18 3:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-18 13:00 ` Don Zickus
2013-04-18 13:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-18 13:52 ` Don Zickus
2013-04-18 14:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-24 14:42 ` Don Zickus
2013-04-24 15:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-27 19:16 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-05-28 1:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-30 20:37 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-05-28 15:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-30 21:54 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-04-18 16:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-04-18 17:44 ` Don Zickus
2013-04-18 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87li8gaku0.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).