public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	"lf-virt" <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:49:06 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350468877-7677-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> When using a virtio transport, the 9p net device allocates pages to back
> the descriptors inserted into the virtqueue. These allocations may be
> performed from atomic context (under the channel lock) and can therefore
> return high mappings which aren't suitable for virt_to_phys.

I had not appreciated that subtlety about GFP_ATOMIC :(

This isn't just 9p, the console, block, scsi and net devices also use
GFP_ATOMIC.

> @@ -165,7 +166,8 @@ static int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
>  	/* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
>  	head = vq->free_head;
>  	vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> -	vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
> +	vq->vring.desc[head].addr = page_to_phys(kmap_to_page(desc)) +
> +				    ((unsigned long)desc & ~PAGE_MASK);
>  	vq->vring.desc[head].len = i * sizeof(struct vring_desc);

Gah, virt_to_phys_harder()?

What's the performance effect?  If it's negligible, why doesn't
virt_to_phys() just do this for us?

We do have an alternate solution: masking out __GFP_HIGHMEM from the
kmalloc of desc.  If it fails, we will fall back to laying out the
virtio request directly inside the ring; if it doesn't fit, we'll wait
for the device to consume more buffers.

> @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ static int p9_get_mapped_pages(struct virtio_chan *chan,
>  		int count = nr_pages;
>  		while (nr_pages) {
>  			s = rest_of_page(data);
> -			pages[index++] = virt_to_page(data);
> +			pages[index++] = kmap_to_page(data);
>  			data += s;
>  			nr_pages--;
>  		}

This seems like a separate bug fix.

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-17 10:14 [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages Will Deacon
2012-10-17 16:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17 16:17   ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18  2:19 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-10-18  9:42   ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 23:39     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox