From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"lf-virt" <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:49:06 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350468877-7677-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> writes:
> When using a virtio transport, the 9p net device allocates pages to back
> the descriptors inserted into the virtqueue. These allocations may be
> performed from atomic context (under the channel lock) and can therefore
> return high mappings which aren't suitable for virt_to_phys.
I had not appreciated that subtlety about GFP_ATOMIC :(
This isn't just 9p, the console, block, scsi and net devices also use
GFP_ATOMIC.
> @@ -165,7 +166,8 @@ static int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> /* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
> head = vq->free_head;
> vq->vring.desc[head].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> - vq->vring.desc[head].addr = virt_to_phys(desc);
> + vq->vring.desc[head].addr = page_to_phys(kmap_to_page(desc)) +
> + ((unsigned long)desc & ~PAGE_MASK);
> vq->vring.desc[head].len = i * sizeof(struct vring_desc);
Gah, virt_to_phys_harder()?
What's the performance effect? If it's negligible, why doesn't
virt_to_phys() just do this for us?
We do have an alternate solution: masking out __GFP_HIGHMEM from the
kmalloc of desc. If it fails, we will fall back to laying out the
virtio request directly inside the ring; if it doesn't fit, we'll wait
for the device to consume more buffers.
> @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ static int p9_get_mapped_pages(struct virtio_chan *chan,
> int count = nr_pages;
> while (nr_pages) {
> s = rest_of_page(data);
> - pages[index++] = virt_to_page(data);
> + pages[index++] = kmap_to_page(data);
> data += s;
> nr_pages--;
> }
This seems like a separate bug fix.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-17 10:14 [PATCH] virtio: 9p: correctly pass physical address to userspace for high pages Will Deacon
2012-10-17 16:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17 16:17 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 2:19 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-10-18 9:42 ` Will Deacon
2012-10-18 23:39 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lif4o739.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox