From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965459AbWFTDv1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:51:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965460AbWFTDv1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:51:27 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41166 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965459AbWFTDv0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:51:26 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Pfaff Subject: Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] acpi: Add IBM R60E laptop to proc-idle blacklist Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:51:09 -0700 Message-ID: <87lkrstrgy.fsf@benpfaff.org> References: <4491BC6B.5000704@oracle.com> <20060619203333.5e897ead.akpm@osdl.org> Reply-To: blp@cs.stanford.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-7-50-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BR2yAFVNugxk1V1fS47cEAZMW4Y= Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:00:43 -0700 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> [UBUNTU:acpi] Add IBM R60E laptop to proc-idle blacklist. >> + { set_max_cstate, "IBM ThinkPad R40e", { >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "IBM"), >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VERSION, "1SET70WW") }, (void*)1}, > > It seems that every R40e in the world is in that table. The email says R60e. The string says R40e. Which is correct? -- Ben Pfaff email: blp@cs.stanford.edu web: http://benpfaff.org