From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:23:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:23:44 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:29612 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:23:43 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: John Goerzen Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.66 Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 08:33:59 -0600 Organization: Complete.Org Message-ID: <87llyyfdig.fsf@complete.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@complete.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:PG1f8DgdIVs++RRiPL/Hug8HUS4= Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > In other words: _despite_ your luddite ways you actually have more > information available to you than you would have had without BK. Not everyone that doesn't use BitKeeper is a luddite. For instance, Ben Collins has been explicitly prevented from using it simply because he happens to work on Subversion. His only option is to shell out thousands for the commercial version. It would serve everyone well to remember that a minority of contributors to this list have the financial resources to work around the onerous licensing terms of BK.