From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 15:54:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msa2r018.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1965cae22a0.12ab5a70c833868.7155412488566097801@linux.beauty>
On Tue, Apr 22 2025 at 16:47, Li Chen wrote:
> Currently, the SMT domain is added into sched_domain_topology
> by default if CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is enabled.
>
> If cpu_attach_domain finds that the CPU SMT domain’s cpumask_weight
> is just 1, it will destroy_sched_domain it.
If cpu_attach_domain() ..., it will destroy it.
> On a large machine, such as one with 512 cores, this results in
> 512 redundant domain attach/destroy operations.
>
> We can avoid these unnecessary operations by simply checking
s/We can avoid/Avoid/
> cpu_smt_num_threads and not inserting SMT domain into x86_topology if SMT
the SMT domain
> is not enabled.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> - x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> - cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
> - };
> + if (cpu_smt_num_threads > 1) {
> + x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> + cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
> + };
> + }
Looks about right, though I really detest this coding style. I'm not
blaming you, as you just followed the already existing bad taste...
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 8:47 [PATCH RESEND] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-06-20 2:27 ` Li Chen
2025-06-20 13:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-06-20 15:47 ` [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Decrapify build_sched_topology() Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-24 9:00 ` [PATCH RESEND] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msa2r018.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox