public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ALSA: usb-audio: Fix possible race at sync of urb completions
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 09:23:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mscat1tq.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250421051832.4179-1-hdanton@sina.com>

On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 07:18:31 +0200,
Hillf Danton wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 09:49:46 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:04:08 +0200, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 08:50:46 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:45:17 +0200, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 13:08:32 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> >> > On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:35:32 +0200 Hillf Danton wrote:
> >> >> > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:08:37 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> >> > > > USB-audio driver tries to sync with the clear of all pending URBs in
> >> >> > > > wait_clear_urbs(), and it waits for all bits in active_mask getting
> >> >> > > > cleared.  This works fine for the normal operations, but when a stream
> >> >> > > > is managed in the implicit feedback mode, there is still a very thin
> >> >> > > > race window: namely, in snd_complete_usb(), the active_mask bit for
> >> >> > > > the current URB is once cleared before re-submitted in
> >> >> > > > queue_pending_output_urbs().  If wait_clear_urbs() is called during
> >> >> > > > that period, it may pass the test and go forward even though there may
> >> >> > > > be a still pending URB.
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > For covering it, this patch adds a new counter to each endpoint to
> >> >> > > > keep the number of in-flight URBs, and changes wait_clear_urbs()
> >> >> > > > checking this number instead.  The counter is decremented at the end
> >> >> > > > of URB complete, hence the reference is kept as long as the URB
> >> >> > > > complete is in process.
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> >> >> > > > ---
> >> >> > > >  sound/usb/card.h     | 1 +
> >> >> > > >  sound/usb/endpoint.c | 7 ++++++-
> >> >> > > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >> > > > 
> >> >> > > > diff --git a/sound/usb/card.h b/sound/usb/card.h
> >> >> > > > index 3329ce710cb9..746a765b2437 100644
> >> >> > > > --- a/sound/usb/card.h
> >> >> > > > +++ b/sound/usb/card.h
> >> >> > > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct snd_usb_endpoint {
> >> >> > > >  	unsigned int nominal_queue_size; /* total buffer sizes in URBs */
> >> >> > > >  	unsigned long active_mask;	/* bitmask of active urbs */
> >> >> > > >  	unsigned long unlink_mask;	/* bitmask of unlinked urbs */
> >> >> > > > +	atomic_t submitted_urbs;	/* currently submitted urbs */
> >> >> > > >  	char *syncbuf;			/* sync buffer for all sync URBs */
> >> >> > > >  	dma_addr_t sync_dma;		/* DMA address of syncbuf */
> >> >> > > >  
> >> >> > > > diff --git a/sound/usb/endpoint.c b/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> >> >> > > > index 29c4865966f5..06241568abf7 100644
> >> >> > > > --- a/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> >> >> > > > +++ b/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> >> >> > > > @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ static void queue_pending_output_urbs(struct snd_usb_endpoint *ep)
> >> >> > > >  		}
> >> >> > > >  
> >> >> > > >  		set_bit(ctx->index, &ep->active_mask);
> >> >> > > > +		atomic_inc(&ep->submitted_urbs);
> >> >> > > >  	}
> >> >> > > >  }
> >> >> > > >  
> >> >> > > > @@ -488,6 +489,7 @@ static void snd_complete_urb(struct urb *urb)
> >> >> > > >  			clear_bit(ctx->index, &ep->active_mask);
> >> >> > > >  			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
> >> >> > > >  			queue_pending_output_urbs(ep);
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > 			smp_mb();
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > > +			atomic_dec(&ep->submitted_urbs); /* decrement at last */
> >> >> > > 
> >> >> > > Does it match the comment to add a mb?
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > How...?  I don't understand your intention.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> In addition to the UAF report [1], I saw a customer report of list
> >> >> corruption of linux-6.1.99 on arm64 this week without reproducer.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 	list corruption
> >> >> 	list_add_tail();
> >> >> 	push_back_to_ready_list();
> >> >> 	snd_complete_urb();
> >> >> 
> >> >> And after another look at this patch I wonder if the race can not be
> >> >> erased without the certainty that ep will be no longer used after the
> >> >> atomic decrement.
> >> >
> >> > But why adding more barrier if you perform the atomic op...?
> >> >
> >> Because atomic op != ordering, see 26fbe9772b8c ("USB: core: Fix hang 
> >> in usb_kill_urb by adding memory barriers") for detail for example.
> >> And c5b2cbdbdac5 ("ipc/mqueue.c: update/document memory barriers") as well.
> >
> > Still don't get it.  Which reads and writes are you trying to solve?
> >
> See a simpler UAF case IIUIC.
> 
> 	cpu1		cpu2
> 			atomic_dec(&ep->submitted_urbs);
> 
> 	if (!atomic_read(&ep->submitted_urbs))
> 		kfree(ep);
> 
> 			a = ep->xxx; // UAF

That's what I don't get it.  Which place does this UAF happen, more
specifically?  In the whole conversations, the context is missing, and
you provided only a snippet of the patch.

> > And more importantly, does it actually help at all?  If yes, I'd
> 
> Yes and No. Yes because of the fix mentioned in ipc wrt mb.
> 
> > happily take the patch, of course.
> >
> Provided a repro, a fix like the following diff should have been posted.

No idea about repro and the report itself, so hard to judge.


Takashi

> 
> 	Hillf
> 
> --- x/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> +++ y/sound/usb/endpoint.c
> @@ -569,8 +569,11 @@ static void snd_complete_urb(struct urb
>  			snd_usb_queue_pending_output_urbs(ep, false);
>  			/* decrement at last, and check xrun */
>  			if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ep->submitted_urbs) &&
> -			    !snd_usb_endpoint_implicit_feedback_sink(ep))
> +			    !snd_usb_endpoint_implicit_feedback_sink(ep)) {
>  				notify_xrun(ep);
> +				smp_mb();
> +				atomic_dec(&ep->submitted_urbs);
> +			}
>  			return;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -602,7 +605,8 @@ static void snd_complete_urb(struct urb
>  
>  exit_clear:
>  	clear_bit(ctx->index, &ep->active_mask);
> -	atomic_dec(&ep->submitted_urbs);
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ep->submitted_urbs))
> +		atomic_dec(&ep->submitted_urbs);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1004,17 +1008,17 @@ static int wait_clear_urbs(struct snd_us
>  
>  	do {
>  		alive = atomic_read(&ep->submitted_urbs);
> -		if (!alive)
> -			break;
> +		if (alive < 0)
> +			goto update;
>  
>  		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
>  	} while (time_before(jiffies, end_time));
>  
> -	if (alive)
> -		usb_audio_err(ep->chip,
> +	usb_audio_err(ep->chip,
>  			"timeout: still %d active urbs on EP #%x\n",
>  			alive, ep->ep_num);
>  
> +update:
>  	if (ep_state_update(ep, EP_STATE_STOPPING, EP_STATE_STOPPED)) {
>  		ep->sync_sink = NULL;
>  		snd_usb_endpoint_set_callback(ep, NULL, NULL, NULL);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210929080844.11583-1-tiwai@suse.de>
     [not found] ` <20210929080844.11583-3-tiwai@suse.de>
     [not found]   ` <20250418103533.4078-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-18 11:08     ` [PATCH 2/9] ALSA: usb-audio: Fix possible race at sync of urb completions Takashi Iwai
     [not found]       ` <20250418144518.4097-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-19  6:50         ` Takashi Iwai
     [not found]           ` <20250419080410.4148-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-20  7:49             ` Takashi Iwai
     [not found]               ` <20250421051832.4179-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-21  7:23                 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
     [not found]                   ` <20250421104343.4197-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-21 14:36                     ` Takashi Iwai
     [not found]                       ` <20250421233900.4221-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-22  7:03                         ` Takashi Iwai
     [not found]                           ` <20250422102933.4239-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-04-22 11:03                             ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mscat1tq.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox