From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DEC1FBE9E for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 20:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741120208; cv=none; b=XBOBPhP9ztXkSLEXlTFh0cHck24M4OhfCd3O37L6X3/NNHByK4KFP74bD50Aa7t98QbhPHY/e5Y0yKyIjzRgDIZ931KXVuCBI9ThuRf/il9VOmpbTPidHaQ+LwEzvhSGiVuhj5b8uYE4jZocCONWicipnw1q8bklyGppo5N23U8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741120208; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n+XCb/mQEAvyAxQV+XgBHDE6MBmGaRcXkZI7v7tKpzk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k8nfxPa9wNdRsVxRNUFkUa5sCDO4dPrdG6l2i6F5MJl0ucBKLtxAl3zU3NWzogJgnp+Hq3M/Mi5lNLAx2PDFx26wnVhAKT9P61arqUQAfgiq/EDuURn30i4UDR+aS4EihJI6D7toDipmUA8aldUCBNd3nMdw99r+LZNmTONZwwQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=QChqHiPG; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=nySXIn4T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="QChqHiPG"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="nySXIn4T" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1741120205; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tawQ88tVituZhPa5H5T3lpBwSfKDNHrvVgtDD+CYQI4=; b=QChqHiPG+CnvjO/82iHkHr0B6rZPgzrx84YI0CN76pOtl+4UVQHEaHcxI84EgHYsN8i02V IpWTawcy/nd29Ff7nK83zCdXk1/30084p2kgpqSwX3RaifwT4Uigl+pqritJ+j7Wf75Oq1 tzNvL2QwEZtnmFQvYpmzCiRpBu4c8t4wRng6n/Y6m956IxzwQTjncU5yqtLLGy3FuOYi+t IKtxcU3YyTcDeBz4xx32gZulQa6lM5r/X/M1MTPygjXA/UC9e7CUbk/5QA9+ih/dSiWJWd BJzaMAu2l5pYjTxhNIb3hntUhFgK6oG2nq3Ncc0dEu71O0CMXHE3CfE5salwyw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1741120205; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tawQ88tVituZhPa5H5T3lpBwSfKDNHrvVgtDD+CYQI4=; b=nySXIn4T8CjjAkp1ZzKiHZ6kL47T+Yl7S7Wo2p0xYx7ivX2Y4LfpdDAk66BqNStm0WmSUx bd3KxpKcJiXzP6Ag== To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: LKML , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , Benjamin Segall , Eric Dumazet , Andrey Vagin , Pavel Tikhomirov , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch V2 10/17] posix-timers: Make signal_struct::next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t In-Reply-To: References: <20250302185753.311903554@linutronix.de> <20250302193627.543399558@linutronix.de> <87sentbyer.ffs@tglx> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:30:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87mse05yk3.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Mar 04 2025 at 20:56, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:24:28PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> Welcome. Some quick validation with CRIU would be appreciated. > > Just tested in criu: works without problem, both modes -- with new > prctl and without it. Note that I only have ran separate posix-timers > test case, probably virtuozzo team might do more deep tesing. Thank you very much! tglx