From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com>, anup@brainfault.org
Cc: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: let the probe of APLIC be earlier than IMSIC
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 12:55:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mslv19ff.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240802075741.316968-1-vincent.chen@sifive.com>
On Fri, Aug 02 2024 at 15:57, Vincent Chen wrote:
> When the debug message of driver/base/dd.c is enabled, the following
> error messages are present in the boot log:
>
> [ 0.207941] platform d000000.aplic: error -EPROBE_DEFER: supplier
> 28000000.imsics not ready
> [ 0.208115] platform d000000.aplic: Added to deferred list
Deferred probing is not an error.
> The reason for this error message is that the probe of APLIC is executed
> earlier than IMSIC. This error also causes all the platform devices
> connected to the APLIC to be added to the deferred list. Because both
> APLIC and IMSIC are registered by device_initcall, this patch adjusts the
> compile order of APLIC and IMSIC to ensure that the probe of IMSIC is
> executed earlier than the probe of APLIC.
And no we are not playing silly ordering games just to suppress a debug
output.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 7:57 [PATCH] irqchip: let the probe of APLIC be earlier than IMSIC Vincent Chen
2024-08-02 10:55 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-08-02 11:02 ` Anup Patel
2024-08-05 2:43 ` Vincent Chen
2024-08-05 8:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-06 1:56 ` Vincent Chen
2024-08-06 3:14 ` Jessica Clarke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mslv19ff.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=vincent.chen@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox