public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Michael <michael@mipisi.de>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] time: alarmtimer: Use TASK_FREEZABLE to cleanup freezer handling
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 12:47:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msmlsh41.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOf5uwkR2TpXN=+D2Gz1M8MDfZn51g1Dqv6eFxSfciBSVA-f=A@mail.gmail.com>

Michael!

On Thu, Jun 27 2024 at 09:46, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:58 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> >> This appears to be still somewhat racy, because the notifier can run
>> >> at this point AFAICS.
>> >
>> > Indeed it is. Let me think more about this.
>>
>> All of this is inherently racy as there is zero feedback whether the
>> event has been consumed or not. Making this feedback based is not
>> necessarily trivial, but let me stare into that.
>>
> Sorry to come back on this topic but I would like to know, if we can
> find a way to be sure
> to not lost wakeup or if you have already addressed in some series

No. I did not take care of it as I got distracted with other important
stuff. Feel free to take up the loose ends of this thread and make it
work. I'm happy to help discussing design choices.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-13 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-11  6:45 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] time: alarmtimer: Fix erroneous case of using 0 as an "invalid" initialization value John Stultz
2023-02-11  6:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] time: alarmtimer: Use TASK_FREEZABLE to cleanup freezer handling John Stultz
2023-02-15  8:22   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-15 13:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-18 14:56   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20  7:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-20  8:23       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20 11:47         ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20 17:48           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-20 18:11             ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20 21:18               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-20 21:32                 ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-21  0:12                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-21  7:10                     ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-24 10:02                       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-24 10:32                         ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-24 11:57                           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-28  0:03                 ` John Stultz
2023-02-28  4:06                   ` John Stultz
2023-03-01 22:11                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-02  0:47                       ` John Stultz
2023-03-02  9:34                         ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-03-02 15:00                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-15 20:12                           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-03-02 14:54                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-02 14:56                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-02 14:32                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-02 22:21                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-02 22:58                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-06-27  7:46                       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2024-07-13 10:47                         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-07-15  8:20                           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-21 11:50   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2024-01-11  8:28   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-18 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] time: alarmtimer: Fix erroneous case of using 0 as an "invalid" initialization value Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87msmlsh41.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=michael@mipisi.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox